exclusionist voice: “we hate TERFs! we always no-platform them any chance we get and don’t want to be associated with them. anyway here’s my story about compulsory heterosexuality …”

discoursegrips:

mogai-is-bogai:

discoursegrips:

mogai-is-bogai:

hevvincourse:

mogai-is-bogai:

ainpost:

discoursecrow:

mypolitics:

mukhannath:

mood

i’m so confused by this?? are you saying compulsory heterosexuality is transphobic?

no_correlation.jpg

A) comparing trans people to terfs
B) sad
C) trans lesbians can also experience compulsory heterosexuality

i THINK it’s cuz someone said that comp het was a term created by terfs?

That’s so damn ignorant. Trans women that are lesbians can experience compulsory heterosexuality, and in fact, a lot of them do like most lesbians. Coming from me, a trans woman who is a lesbian and does, in fact, experience compulsory heterosexuality. So, this is transmisogynistic, again. Just because a term was made by shitty people doesn’t mean that everyone who uses it is shitty, it’s a term with a meaning and the meaning is not about the person who made it. If we acted like that in regards to every term we’d have barely anything to use.

oh for sure, i’m just saying i think that’s why anon said that. comp het is very useful terminology.

@mypolitics @discoursecrow @ainpost @mogai-is-bogai @hevvincourse the point is that, though its a useful concept to have the language to talk about, the term was created by a transmisoynist. create a new term 

talking over a trans woman? i see i see

now its my turn to use this 

internalised heteronormativity. It’s a more coherent term, it doesn’t have a TERF connection, it hasn’t been used as ‘proof’ that bisexual women are wrong for IDing as bi, it’s really not difficult to use

also i swear stop fucking pulling this “you’re a transmisogynist for disagreeing with the trans women on our side of the discourse” it’s really embarrassing. you’re just closing your eyes and hoping there aren’t trans women who disagree w you