We cannot erase history! I know, I know, its unfortunate that the only method weâve got to document historical events are huge statues celebrating racists, but there is simply no other way!
If youâve spent any time discussing or reading about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, I guarantee youâve heard some variation of this statement:
OMG, Jews think any criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic!Â
In the interests of this post, Iâm going to assume that the people who express such sentiments are acting in good faith and really donât mean to cause pain to or problems for Diaspora Jewry. For those good-faith people, I present some guidelines for staying on the good side of that admittedly murky line, along with the reasoning why the actions I list are problematic. (And bad-faith people, you can no longer plead ignorance if you engage in any of these no-nos. Consider yourselves warned.) In no particular order:
Donât use the terms âbloodthirsty,â âlust for Palestinian blood,â or similar. Historically, Jews have been massacred in the belief that we use the blood of non-Jews (particularly of children) in our religious rituals. This belief still persists in large portions of the Arab world (largely because white Europeans deliberately spread the belief among Arabs) and even in parts of the Western world. Murderous, inhumane, cruel, viciousâfine. But bloodâŠjust donât go there. Depicting Israel/Israelis/Israeli leaders eating children is also a no-no, for the same reason.
Donât use crucifixion imagery. Another huge, driving motivation behind anti-Semitism historically has been the belief that the Jews, rather than the Romans, crucified Jesus. As in #1, this belief still persists. There are plenty of other ways to depict suffering that donât call back to ancient libels.
Donât demand that Jews publicly repudiate the actions of settlers and extremists. People who make this demand are assuming that Jews are terrible people or undeserving of being heard out unless they âproveâ themselves acceptable by non-Jewsâ standards. (Itâs not okay to demand Palestinians publicly repudiate the actions of Hamas in order to be accepted/trusted, either.)
Donât say âthe Jewsâ when you mean Israel. I think this should be pretty clear. The people in power in Israel are Jews, but not all Jews are Israelis (let alone Israeli leaders).
Donât say âZionistsâ when you mean Israel. Zionism is no more a dirty word than feminism. It is simply the belief that the Jews should have a country in part of their ancestral homeland where they can take refuge from the anti-Semitism and persecution they face everywhere else. It does not mean a belief that Jews have a right to grab land from others, a belief that Jews are superior to non-Jews, or any other such tripe, any more than feminism means hating men. Unless you believe that Israel should entirely cease to exist, you are yourself Zionist. Furthermore, using âZionistsâ in place of âIsraelisâ is inaccurate and harmful. The word âZionistsâ includes Diasporan Jews as well (most of whom support a two-state solution and pretty much none of whom have any influence on Israelâs policies) and is used to justify anti-Semitic attacks outside Israel (i.e., they brought it on themselves by being Zionists). And many of the Jews IN Israel who are most violent against Palestinians are actually anti-Zionistâthey believe that the modern state of Israel is an offense against God because it isnât governed by halakha (traditional Jewish religious law). Be careful with the labels you use.
Donât call Jews you agree with âthe good Jews.â Imposing your values on another group is not okay. Tokenizing is not okay. Appointing yourself the judge of what other groups can or should believe is not okay.
Donât use your Jewish friends or Jews who agree with you as shields. (AKA, âI canât be anti-Semitic, I have Jewish friends!â or âWell, Jew X agrees with me, so youâre wrong.â) Again, this behavior is tokenizing and essentially amounts to you as a non-Jew appointing yourself arbiter over what Jews can/should feel or believe. You donât get to do that.
Donât claim that Jews are ethnically European. Jews come in many colorsâwhite is only one. Besides, the fact that many of us have some genetic mixing with the peoples who tried to force us to assimilate (be they German, Indian, Ethiopian, ItalianâŠ) doesnât change the fact that all our common ancestral roots go back to Israel.
Donât claim that Jews âarenât the TRUE/REAL Jews.â Enough said.
Donât claim that Jews have no real historical connection to Israel/the Temple Mount. Archaeology and the historical record both establish that this is false.
Donât accuse Diasporan Jews of dual loyalties or treason. This is another charge that historically has been used to justify persecution and murder of Jews. Having a connection to our ancestral homeland is natural. Having a connection to our co-religionists who live there is natural. It is no more treasonous for a Jew to consider the well-being of Israel when casting a vote than for a Muslim to consider the well-being of Islamic countries when voting. (Tangent: fuck drone strikes. End tangent.)
Donât claim that the Jews control the media/banks/country that isnât Israel.  Yet another historical anti-Semitic claim is that Jews as a group intend to control the world and try to achieve this aim through shadowy, sinister channels. There are many prominent Jews in the media and in the banking industry, yes, but they arenât engaged in any kind of organized conspiracy to take over those industries, they simply work in those industries. The phrase âthe Jews controlâ should never be heard in a debate/discussion of Israel.
Donât depict the Magen David (Star of David) as an equivalent to the Nazi swastika. The Magen David represents all Jewsânot just Israelis, not just people who are violent against Palestinians, ALL JEWS. When you do this, you are painting all Jews as violent, genocidal racists. DONâT.
Donât use the Holocaust/Nazism/Hitler as a rhetorical prop. The Jews who were murdered didnât set foot in what was then Palestine, let alone take part in Israeli politics or policies. It is wrong and appropriative to try to use their deaths to score political points. Genocide, racism, occupation, murder, exterminationâgo ahead and use those terms, but leave the Holocaust out of it.
In visual depictions (i.e., political cartoons and such), donât depict Israel/Israelis as Jewish stereotypes. Donât show them in Chassidic, black-hat garb. Donât show them with exaggerated noses or frizzled red hair or payus (earlocks). Donât show them with horns or depict them as the Devil. Donât show them cackling over/hoarding money. Donât show them drinking blood or eating children (see #1). Donât show them raping non-Jewish women. The Nazis didnât invent the tropes they used in their propagandaâall of these have been anti-Semitic tropes going back centuries. (The red hair trope, for instance, goes back to early depictions of Judas Iscariot as a redhead, and the horns trope stems from the belief that Jews are the Devilâs children, sent to destroy the world as best we can for our âfather.â)
Donât use the phrase âthe chosen peopleâ to deride or as proof of Jewish racism. When Jews say we are the chosen people, we donât mean that we are biologically superior to others or that God loves us more than other groups. Judaism in fact teaches that everyone is capable of being a righteous, Godly person, that Jews have obligations to be ethical and decent to âthe stranger in our midst,â and that non-Jews donât get sent to some kind of damnation for believing in another faith. When we say weâre the chosen people, we mean that, according to our faith, God gave us extra responsibilities and codes of behavior that other groups arenât burdened with, in the form of the Torah. Thatâs all it means.
Donât claim that anti-Semitism is eradicated or negligible. It isnât. In fact, according to international watchdog groups, itâs sharply on the rise. (Which sadly isnât surprisingâanti-Semitism historically surges during economic downturns, thanks to the belief that Jews control the banks.) This sort of statement is extremely dismissive and accuses us of lying about our own experiences.
Donât say that since Palestinians are Semites, Jews/Israelis are anti-Semitic, too. You do not get to redefine the oppressions of others, nor do you get to police how they refer to that oppression. This also often ties into #8. Donât do it. Anti-Semitism has exclusively meant anti-Jewish bigotry for a good century plus now. Coin your own word for anti-Palestinian oppression, or just call it what it is: racism mixed with Islamophobia.
Donât blow off Jews telling you that what youâre saying is anti-Semitic with some variant of the statement at the top of this post. Not all anti-Israel speech is anti-Semitic (a lot of it is valid, much-deserved criticism), but some certainly is. Actually give the accusation your consideration and hear the accuser out. If they fail to convince you, thatâs fine. But at least hear them out (without talking over them) before you decide that.
Iâm sure this isnât a comprehensive list, but it covers all the hard-and-fast rules I can think of. (I welcome input for improving it.)
But wait! Why should I care about any of this? Iâm standing up for people who are suffering!
You should care because nonsense like the above makes Jews sympathetic to the Palestinian plight wary and afraid of joining your cause. You should care because, unfortunately, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has correlated to an uptick in anti-Semitic attacks around the world, attacks on Jews who have no say in Israeli politics, and this kind of behavior merely aggravates that, whether you intend it to or not.Â
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a real minefield in that itâs a clash between oppressed people of color and an ethnoreligious group that is dominant in Israel but marginalized and brutalized elsewhere (often nowadays on the exact grounds that they share ethnoreligious ties with the people of Israel), so itâs damned hard to toe the line of being socially aware and sensitive to both groups. I get that. But I think it is possible to toe that line, and I hope this post helps with that. (And if a Palestinian makes a similar list of problematic arguments they hear targeted at them, Iâd be happy to reblog it, too.)
So, TL;DR version:
Do go ahead and criticize Israel.
Donât use anti-Semitic stereotypes or tropes.
Donât use overly expansive language that covers Jews as a whole and not just Israel.
Donât use lies to boost your claims.
Do engage Jews in conversation on the issues of Israel and of anti-Semitism, rather than simply shutting them down for disagreeing.
Do try to be sensitive to the fact that, fair or not, many people take verbal or violent revenge for the actions of Israelis on Diasporan Jews, and Diasporan Jews are understandably frightened and upset by this.
That might be one of the most powerful political quotes of 2017. Â
transmed voice: I have never once considered psychology as a discipline to be anything but completely Objective. If something is listed as a mental illness, then it is! Iâve never heard of the word âpathologisationâ in my life and I donât have enough historical knowledge to understand how science and academia can be tools against marginalised people. Iâve never heard about how women masturbating and black people wanting to escape slavery have also been classified as mental illnesses, or iâm naive enough to think that the systems that once enabled this have changed or dissapeared.
i also just hate trans people who scrape enough self-esteem together to not hate their body, and will fight against trans positivity at every turn đ This is what I Objectively think as a Fellow Trans, and iâm going to avoid thinking about how every thing i say benefits TERFs and other people who will send me to conversion camp the second they get the chance đ
iâm also a conservative or libertarian leaning trans guy under the age of 21
sorry if me Stating the Facts offends you sweaty :â)
Anyway I finally made the quiz. The was actually a p low character count of the quiz, so I had to cut a lot of the quotes down with ââŠâ but I tried to keep the general gist of the quotes tho.
Take this quiz from a kindred spirit blog, lol transmisogyny cw obviously
This is actually hard as fuck and puts a light to terfsâ beliefs ~đ±
I spend a good amount of time arguing with terfs and I only got 3/10
I got 5 out of 10, it seems most ppl get around 3-5 right ~đ±
4 out of 10
I got 2/10. Iâve read through numerous terf posts on tumblr and spent hours arguing with conservative men on Facebook comment threads and I got 2/10 Just take a second to think about that
-Mod Ash
I got a 50% and I was in the higher percentile
wow guys really
spoilers: that oneâs a TERF answer. i was surprised too, I thought it was a quote from the actual Pope. from either his âtransgenders are the Annihilation of Manâ speech or the âtheyâre worse than nuclear weapons because they defy natural orderâ speech. a bit unfair tbh
you idiot im making fun of you
no terf thinks that
thanksâ dude i really am going to take this to heart, just thank u for opening my eyes
Anyway I finally made the quiz. The was actually a p low character count of the quiz, so I had to cut a lot of the quotes down with ââŠâ but I tried to keep the general gist of the quotes tho.
Take this quiz from a kindred spirit blog, lol transmisogyny cw obviously
This is actually hard as fuck and puts a light to terfsâ beliefs ~đ±
I spend a good amount of time arguing with terfs and I only got 3/10
I got 5 out of 10, it seems most ppl get around 3-5 right ~đ±
4 out of 10
I got 2/10. Iâve read through numerous terf posts on tumblr and spent hours arguing with conservative men on Facebook comment threads and I got 2/10 Just take a second to think about that
-Mod Ash
I got a 50% and I was in the higher percentile
wow guys really
spoilers: that one’s a TERF answer. i was surprised too, I thought it was a quote from the actual Pope. from either his ‘transgenders are the Annihilation of Man’ speech or the ‘they’re worse than nuclear weapons because they defy natural order’ speech. a bit unfair tbh