Statements that are literally TERF rhetoric that I’ve seen inclusionists say

lilycourse:

clitcheese:

lilycourse:

lilycourse:

lilycourse:

  • trans people were added in later in the LGBT movement
  • straight trans people can call themselves gay
  • trans men can call themselves lesbians
  • cis lgbp should quit using the word cis in cishet and cis aroace, even though by doing so, you’d implicitly be kicking out trans/nb people
  • aces have a greater right to LGBT spaces than trans people do, because asexuality is a sexuality and trans isn’t
  • defending TERFs from meanies who want them run over by a bus

trans people were added in later in the LGBT movement

image
image
image
image

straight trans people can call themselves gay, or how they can’t be straight

image
image
image
image

trans men can call themselves lesbians

image
image
image
image

us cis lgbp should quit using the word cis in cishet and cis aroace, implicitly kicking out trans/nb people, and also ignoring that straight trans people don’t oppress us cis lgbp

image
image
image

aces have a greater right to lgbt spaces than trans people do, because asexuality is a sexuality and trans isn’t

image

defending TERFs from meanies who want them run over by a bus

image

(context for above screenshot, so you can see for yourself that slimecourse was telling off a TERF)

exclusionists pointing out how SAM can be used in transphobic way (but if someone can actually find someone using the SAM in a transphobic way, go ahead and add on)

image
image

pitting lg vs. bt, erasing trans/nb gay and lesbian people

image
image
image
image

uninucleus call out (who I’ve heard still kept kept their popularity after it came to light they were a TERF)

Also, thank you to @fuckradfems for double-checking these screenshots, @discoursepsychic for suggesting a screenshot

@clitcheese

hey um, when I said a call-out post? i meant a call-out post and not this useless sack of crap i have to sift through. are you trying to be unhelpful?

as i have already plainly explained, we actually did have to fight for trans and bi recognition. this is basic, basic history, and notΒ β€˜erasing trans people from the movement’, it’s literally basically recognising that we have been already erased from the movement by cis people. for the love of fuck i can’t actually simplify this anymore. Trans people start movement. Gay movement decides it wants nothing to do with trans people. trans people fight this. the letter T is added so that doesn’t happen again. are we clear on this

the second screenshot actually goes into this in more detail than i can? there’s literally nothing incorrect here? what are you even calling out here? that we’re acknowledging trans erasure? do you want to call out someone for a goddamn history lesson? you get that what you’re doing here as a cis person is deliberately misleading right? there are young people who still remember the acronym before it included the T, considering this was a debate topic in the 90s and well into the 00s.

anonymous posts

@hookandcook says straight trans people can call themselves gay. i should point out hookandcook is, a gay trans person, but what the hell. hey dude, while straight trans people are queer for being trans, you can’t use gay and queer interchangeably like that. it’s pretty straightforward that it’s disrespectful to gay people for any straight people to call themselves gay.Β 

alright! someone with an actual URL saying fucked up shit! this wasn’t so difficult was it? @rainbowgoddamnunicorn, who i can’t tag, great, but yeah what the fuck

the next anon is rubbish but they’re touching on something i’ve talked about, that trans people rarely have straight privilege even if they’re completely hetero because of the obscene kinds of hoops one has to jump through to be considered β€˜straight’, so like, they’re being reductive but calling this anon transphobic… is a reach

all the callouts for saying trans men can be lesbians belong to @yall-aphobes-need-to-stop finally, it’s also literally up there on their blog admitting that they said it too. there’s also a bunch of callouts already in their url tag, so i suggest blocking them!

each and every single call out for policing cis people’s use ofΒ β€˜cishet’ goes to trans people! aphobic-hau and babblingqueerace and transkrem! they’re all fucking trans! you’re calling out trans people for literally fucking calling out cis people… in a way you don’t like! you can call me out for this too, i stand by this.Β cis people need to… actually fucking listen to trans people on this. honestly. cis people labelling their oppressors asΒ β€˜cishets’ instead of as fucking straights only serves to distance themselves from their own cis privilege. and like, in the post i already linked to, sometimes trans people can actually have straight privilege? addingΒ β€˜cis’ doesn’t actually let us have a nuanced discussion about the dynamics trans people have towards straightness. and if this really erases trans people, you really have to explain to me how? i’m fucking trans and i can’t actually make sense of your complaint here.

hey quick aside if you crop out the URL on a post? it’s fucking useless thanks

more for yall-aphobes-need-to-stop, as well as @shybiviolet, hello you should let people be mad a terfs, because terfs are fucking trash, okay, cool

underΒ β€˜pitting lg vs bt’ you’ve put in that basic history lesson from before in again, i think you should read it actually? like what do you not like about it, the insinuation that bi people have faced biphobia? that cis people have been transphobic? nothing here actually demonises anyone, it’s just talking about the community’s history with respectability politics.

hey callout post for all these anons for being homophobic! you know these are completely fucking useless right. because they’re anonymous. like Barack Obama could have sent them for all the fuck i know. you know you can send these to yourself, that’s why they’re completely useless as evidence for anything.Β 

and @next-venoms who i think you’ll find is a fucking guro blog? and they could have worded it in a less divisive way but, i think i really agree with the sentiment? is this really the hill you want to die on. i can’t speak for biphobia, but you know cis people abuse trans people in LGBTI/queer spaces all the time right? the LGBTI community was built on trans women’s backs.. the only thing problematic here is that it erases that bi people have as much cis privilege as gays and lesbians. but sure, let’s all call out this problematic goreporn blog

so. let’s tally up everyone who actually parroted anything even remotely simialar to what terfs have ever said;

  1. rainbowgoddamnunicorn
  2. @yall-aphobes-need-to-stop

you could have just given me the reciepts for those two. this was the most amazingly frustrating thing you could have done here. you could have at least figured out for yourself that transkrem, who has trans in their goddamn username, actually has a much more valid opinion on the word cishets than you do.. if you want me to call out anything ever again, you can at least make it readable. and not call out trans people for talking about trans issues and calling it TERF rhetoric. that’s literally a polite, basic minimum for these kinds of posts right.

oh and also can you do me a favour? it’s to never speak about transphobia ever again. you have no idea how to use that word and it’s not your fucking discourse card. literally fucking consult me or another trans person first before you make another post this useless and misleading again.

Not all of those screenshots are mine, and some other person cropped out the op of those posts. I literally consulted a trans person when compiling those posts. I also interpreted stuff like the T was added later as in trans people weren’t always there and were added later to the community, and promoting the LG vs BT split, which ignores trans gay people and that cis bi people can still be transphobic. Like, do inclusionists think all LG people are cis? There are also trans people saying that it’s 100% okay for us to use cishet, so your point? Those anons are obviously inclusionists and shows that transphobic sentiment is there. I’m not sure what else I could do there? Does anyone else care to join in?

yeah no matter how many times you, a cis person, willfully misinterpret what trans people have been saying to you, it doesn’t somehow make it TERF rhetoric. don’t repeat this to me again. i’m a trans lesbian so of course i’m not standing by this bullshit where you think i’m saying
‘all LG people are cis’, and neither did the screenshots you gave me that were clealy from other trans people.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.