if you actually want to signal inclusivity towards trans women – moreso than “for women” already does – without reinforcing the presumed default of “not inclusive to trans women”, then the phrase you should use is “for women (including cis women)”
if you actually want to signal inclusivity towards trans women – moreso than “for women” already does – without reinforcing the presumed default of “not inclusive to trans women”, then the phrase you should use is “for women (including cis women)”