peasantchick

toujours-fidele:

zestypotatos666:

lilacbreastedroller:

scissortailedsaint:

stupid cats are valid

cats who aren’t graceful and thud to the ground like a bag of rocks are VALID

cats who run around the room and ram into the door are VALID

cats who get their claws stuck in things and meow at you to help them are VALID

silversarcasm:

we literally cannot get rid of ableism without dismantling capitalism, more disabled workers being exploited is not our path to liberation lmao

cause of death: the “farenheit is more intuitive than celsius” post

class-struggle-feminism:

the-laissez-fairest-of-them-all:

tilthat:

TIL in 1981, the Brazilian dictatorship planned an attack to an event attended by 20k people. The 2 soldiers that carried the attack made a mistake and ended up blowing the bomb on themselves (1 dead, 1 injured). The attack was planned to convince the country that left-wing guerrilas were a threat.

via reddit.com

You antifa soyboys hear that? This is why nobody is afraid of you.

imagine having reading comprehension thats this bad

aphobehaterofficial:

sentientviolets:

I saw that one advert supporting autism $peaks that said sth like “it costs $60,000 more per year to care for a person with autism” and let me tell you.

those figures only made me feel like a burden on my family. my first thought wasn’t “this is something in support of autistic people!” it was “do I really cost my family that much?”

it’s not like the advert gave legitimate sources for that statistic. it’s not like they made it clear what the donations going to autism $peaks would be used for. it mostly just made us out to be a burden.

that advert wasn’t “help autistic people”, it was “give sympathy points to caregivers who have to deal with an autistic person”.

it didn’t read like “we’re here to help people!”. it read like “look how awful it is to deal with an autistic person”.

it didn’t paint us as people, it painted us as problems.

that’s the issue present in all adverts published by or in support of autism $peaks. the goal isn’t to help us. it’s not about the autistic people. it’s about the caregivers. it’s about making sure the general public thinks society is better of without autistic people.

it’s “look at this poor caregiver! their life wouldn’t be like this without that nasty autism!”

to support autism $peaks is to support the idea that autistic people are not people, but problems.

we are not a problem to be fixed. we are autistic people, and we don’t need autism $peaks to speak for us.

ALL CHILDREN NEED MONEY

NEEDING MONEY IS NOT EXCLUSIVE TO AUTISTIC CHILDREN

doubletranquility:

doubletranquility:

2001-2017: smash mouth is the shrek band

2018: shrek mouth is the pussy eating band

the typo i made on this post is funnier than the original joke

lesserjoke:

fleetwoodbrak:

gollums loincloth is like 2 inches of toilet paper and he’s hopping around like disneys quasimodo doing acrobatics and we as an audience are narrowly spared from seeing his peepee but you cannot you CANNOT argue that sam and frodo didnt see it at least once!! they didn’t want to but they didn’t have things like camera angles to save them they probably saw gollums swinging little meat sack a hundred times and both of them just decided to never ever mention it

did they decide to never ever mention it or are they talking about it constantly every time the camera cuts away? we the audience get to decide and that’s why i think fiction is so powerful