Want to Know How the Cops Actually Trace a Gun?

torrid-wind:

By Jeanne Marie Laskas
August 30, 2016

There’s no telling how many guns we have in America—and when one gets used in a crime, no way for the cops to connect it to its owner. The only place the police can turn for help is a Kafkaesque agency in West Virginia, where, thanks to the gun lobby, computers are illegal and detective work is absurdly antiquated. On purpose. Thing is, the geniuses who work there are quietly inventing ways to do the impossible.

Say there’s a murder. Blood everywhere, a dead guy on the floor. The cops come in with their yellow tape, chalk line, the little booties, cameras, swabs, the fingerprint dust. One of them finds a gun on the floor. The gun! He lifts it with his pinkie, examines it, takes note of the serial number. Back at the station, they run a trace on the gun. A name pops up. It’s the wife! Or: It’s the business partner! It’s somebody’s gun, and this is so exciting because now they know who did it.

Except—no. You are watching too much TV. It doesn’t work like that.

“Think,” says Charlie Houser, a federal agent with the ATF. We’re in his office, a corner, and he’s got a whiteboard behind him where he’s splashed diagrams, charts, numbers.

The cops run a trace on a gun? What does that even mean? A name pops up? From where? There’s some master list somewhere? Like, for all the guns all over the world, there’s a master list that started with the No. 1 (when? World War I? Civil War? Russian Revolution? when?), and in the year 2016 we are now up to No. 14 gazillion whatever, and every single one of those serial numbers has a gun owner’s name attached to it on some giant list somewhere (where?), which, thank God, a big computer is keeping track of?

“People don’t think,” Charlie tells me. He’s a trim guy, 51, full lips and a thin goatee, and he likes to wear three-piece suits. They fit loose, so the overall effect is awkward innocence, like an eighth grader headed to his first formal. “ I get e-mails even from police saying, ‘Can you type in the serial number and tell me who the gun is registered to?’ Every week. They think it’s like a VIN number on a car. Even police. Police from everywhere. ‘Hey, can you guys hurry up and type that number in?’”

…So here’s a news flash, from Charlie: “We ain’t got a registration system. Ain’t nobody registering no damn guns.”


There is no national database of guns. We have no centralized record of who owns all the firearms we so vigorously debate, no hard data regarding how many people own them, how many of them are bought or sold, or how many even exist.

…The National Tracing Center is not allowed to have centralized computer data.

“That’s the big no-no,” says Charlie.

That’s been a federal law, thanks to the NRA, since 1986: No searchable database of America’s gun owners. So people here have to use paper, sort through enormous stacks of forms and record books that gun stores are required to keep and to eventually turn over to the feds when requested. It’s kind of like a library in the old days—but without the card catalog. They can use pictures of paper, like microfilm (they recently got the go-ahead to convert the microfilm to PDFs), as long as the pictures of paper are not searchable. You have to flip through and read. No searching by gun owner. No searching by name.

“Okay?” Charlie’s tapping a box of Winston Reds. His smile is impish, like he’s daring you to say what needs to be said: This is a fucking nightmare…

[Read entire article]

Want to Know How the Cops Actually Trace a Gun?

foulmouthedliberty:

punlich:

Everyone’s like “when you stop being dirt poor you’ll start liking capitalism” and now that I’m actually able to survive and have some financial security I’m like, “nope still have long term memory and still want to Eat The Rich”

AKA: you don’t have to be the one suffering to want to end suffering

kelpforestdweller:

pull-the-tooth:

A self-described nazi mows down kids at a 40% Jewish high school with a weapon designed for the battlefield: time to demonize poor mental health and neurodivergence and mention one or both whenever we mention the shooting even though literal white supremacy is to blame!

while simultaneously completely failing to mention the antisemitism almost every fucking time it comes up anywhere

Hey just letting you know, f*g isn’t a slur you can reclaim if you’re not a gay man. idk if you identify as that or not, just because in your bio previously you had written ‘transbian’, which I think insinuates you’re female aligned

patrexes:

i 100% understand why you think that! however! slurs are complicated, identities are super complicated (and i don’t feel like spending three paragraphs detailing mine), and not only is fag a term that’s levelled pretty indiscriminately against queers as a general rule and especially towards transfeminine people, the differentiation between feminine gay men and trans girls is… really new. fag is both of ours. fairy is both of ours. molly and baeddel and argr are all both of ours. 

end-of is really, not everyone agrees that only gay men can say fag, but even if they did, my identity is messy and complicated and not necessarily perfectly in line with current discourse on gender/sexuality theory, the word is an important part of my identity, and i apologize for any discomfort that (or any of the various slurs i use) causes but my identity is not for you to police. 

also, here’s a pretty great post.

seeing people thinking fag isn’t thrown at trans women because it’s a slur for ‘male aligned people’ is always a fun reminder that non trans women and esp cis people just have no fucking clue.

it’s a slur associated w gay men. & that’s Exactly why it’s used against us. it has the connotations that someone’s a failure for a lack of masculinity. did u really think people are looking at trans women and thinking, “i’m going to throw a slur at her, but i have to respect her identity and not misgender her with a male aligned term, i’m only verbally abusing her I don’t want to be cruel or anything”

the news keeps reporting on that uni of Newcastle hazing video as “including footage of students made to drink from each other’s ballsacks” and geez that’s an ambiguous sentence i keep thinking the worst and that they’re puncturing them with straws like fucking capri suns but, it’s just like, holding out the scrotum and pooling alcohol in it like a kinda fucked version of belly button shots but oh my god the way they say it every fucking time i just hear. that they’re drinking scrotum fluid. They Need to find a more clear way to say this