[Caption: An image of a person in a wheelchair, seemingly about to go out for the day. They are stretching their shirt so it can be read by the viewer. On the shirt is written, “I RUN BETTER THAN THE GOVERNMENT”]
[id: a facebook marketplace listing. “Nice, rugged pair of Steel-Toed Crocks. $200. Washington, MO. New, only wore to work one day, got fired. Could really use the cash. $200 or best over over $100″(sic). the crocs are black, and the steel caps are on the outside.]
once a month I loudly lament the fact that it’s extremely hard to wear my favorite shirt in public
Description: a picture of a shirt featuring spongebob screaming and cop car emojis on fire. Text at the top and bottom reads “🚫LIFE IS A FUCKING SCAM🚫🚫5500 YEARS OF CIVILIZATION🚫” Under which it says “🚫WE SAY ‘NO MORE!‘🚫” over “FUCK OFF”
Gee, I wonder what in the world happened just prior to 1945 that would have led to this conclusion.
this motherfucker explained why “so much for the tolerant left” was bullshit seventy years ago and people still won’t cut it out
“Intolerance of bigotry is not comparable to intolerance of humanity”
Tolerance Is Not a Moral Precept:
“Tolerance is not a moral absolute; it is a peace treaty. Tolerance is a social norm because it allows different people to live side-by-side without being at each other’s throats. It means that we accept that people may be different from us, in their customs, in their behavior, in their dress, in their sex lives, and that if this doesn’t directly affect our lives, it is none of our business. But the model of a peace treaty differs from the model of a moral precept in one simple way: the protection of a peace treaty only extends to those willing to abide by its terms. It is an agreement to live in peace, not an agreement to be peaceful no matter the conduct of others. A peace treaty is not a suicide pact.”
We need to stop thinking of tolerance as a matter of ethical values, and move it to the same category as privacy: if someone is buying bomb parts and setting off explosions in their back yard, the neighbors may try to find out if they’re a danger to the whole community.
Bigots are a danger to the whole community; they don’t get the polite treatment we offer to people who are just trying to live their lives in peace.
THIS THO
ALL OF THIS
I wrote an essay on the tolerance paradox for school! Very interesting.
[id: a Wikipedia article on the paradox of tolerance. It says, “The paradox of tolerance, first described by Karl Popper in 1945, is a decision theory paradox. The paradox states that if a society is tolerant without limit, their ability to be tolerant will eventually be seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Popper came to the seemingly paradoxical conclusion that in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance.”
🍓🧀 (archive) 