not to sound like an old woman with an enchanted mirror begging at the side of a medieval road but it’s amazing how much greed has become a publicly acceptable attribute and one day and possibly soon we WILL pay for it
Capitalism is only sustainable through a system of violence and social control
I still have a copy of the t*rget team lead guide to dealing with union activity that I nicked from the office when I worked there, it’s mostly the same stuff but it also revealed just how much of their management tactics were intended to frustrate any unionizing activity. For instance, they said that cross-training in multiple departments was the best way to get reliable hours, and encouraged everyone to do it; according to the manual, however, it was their way of keeping departments mixed up and jumbled, making it impossible for any single department to unionize (and forcing anyone who wanted to unionize to get the entire store to do it).
And that’s just part what the store managers are taught. Throughout, it mentions holding off on action and consulting a labor relations officer in the company on how to proceed. Who knows what kind of shady shit the people a step above do?
If you’re in retail and wondering how to go about unionizing, contact an existing retail workers union.
They are all very familiar with the anti-union tactics of retail owners and managers, and will have some advice for you, some literature to distribute, and strategies to counter these tactics. It has historically been extremely hard for retail and fast food employees to unionize specifically because the owners and managers keep us scared, disorganized, and are happy to fire us for unionizing, labor laws be damned. Their entire business model hinges on us being overworked and underpaid. Contact a union for help organizing in your store.
Wow jeeze I sure do wonder what would happen if money didn’t matter and every body else didn’t have to wait for some rich fucker to strut down from their mountain of money to gift us a pebble from it.
Gee, I wonder what in the world happened just prior to 1945 that would have led to this conclusion.
this motherfucker explained why “so much for the tolerant left” was bullshit seventy years ago and people still won’t cut it out
“Intolerance of bigotry is not comparable to intolerance of humanity”
Tolerance Is Not a Moral Precept:
“Tolerance is not a moral absolute; it is a peace treaty. Tolerance is a social norm because it allows different people to live side-by-side without being at each other’s throats. It means that we accept that people may be different from us, in their customs, in their behavior, in their dress, in their sex lives, and that if this doesn’t directly affect our lives, it is none of our business. But the model of a peace treaty differs from the model of a moral precept in one simple way: the protection of a peace treaty only extends to those willing to abide by its terms. It is an agreement to live in peace, not an agreement to be peaceful no matter the conduct of others. A peace treaty is not a suicide pact.”
We need to stop thinking of tolerance as a matter of ethical values, and move it to the same category as privacy: if someone is buying bomb parts and setting off explosions in their back yard, the neighbors may try to find out if they’re a danger to the whole community.
Bigots are a danger to the whole community; they don’t get the polite treatment we offer to people who are just trying to live their lives in peace.
THIS THO
ALL OF THIS
I wrote an essay on the tolerance paradox for school! Very interesting.
[id: a Wikipedia article on the paradox of tolerance. It says, “The paradox of tolerance, first described by Karl Popper in 1945, is a decision theory paradox. The paradox states that if a society is tolerant without limit, their ability to be tolerant will eventually be seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Popper came to the seemingly paradoxical conclusion that in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance.”
liberals: what do you mean “200 years”? ever since the first chimpanzee picked up a stick to eat ants with and called it his, every society in the whole world has operated under capitalism! bartering, gift economies, feudalism, mercantilism, hunter-gatherer societies, all these different institutions in their many forms are all types of capitalism, as long as any single person owns a toothbrush!
liberals: but also communism can only ever take exactly 1 form and it’s exactly like the USSR
“Bad and damnable as work under capitalism may be, still worse is the lack of work. Like every commodity, labor power sometimes finds no buyer. The problematic liberty of the worker to choose his master goes hand in hand with the liberty of the capitalist to engage or to dismiss his workers. In the continuous development of capitalism, in the founding of new enterprises and the decline or collapse of old ones, the workers are driven to and fro, are accumulated here, dismissed there. So they must consider it good luck even, when they are allowed to let themselves be exploited. Then they perceive that they are at the mercy of capital. That only with the consent of the masters they have access to the machines that wait for their handling.”
“Communism and Nazism are equally bad and also both somehow leftist, but also, if it comes down to it, I am absolutely supporting the Nazis.” – Conservatives irl
🍓🧀 (archive) 