I think Queer is possibly singled out as an irreclaimable slur/identity term because it is such a fluid and encompassing term. Literally anyone who feels they fall outside of cishetero-normativity can use Queer and that is where it comes up against objections. People who want to cause rifts within the community will fight against its use and shout “Queer is a slur” and exclusionists pick it up and use it as a way to close people out. They don’t want the umbrella wide like Queer gives us

apersnicketylemon:

thefisherqueen:

terflies:

Oh yes, absolutely.

Queer is dangerous to these people; they want it to be a slur.

We’re here, we’re queer, we’re dangerous to gatekeepers, and that’s a good thing

It’s especially apparent that their real issue is not with it ā€˜being a slur’ when we consider the term ā€˜MOGAI’.

This term was not a slur. It had no ā€˜problematic’ beginnings, has never been co-opted by straight and cis society, was for us by us, did not include anyone who did not need to be included, but it was very inclusive. So they lied about it, rejected it, and use it as an insult against people. They talk about ā€˜The mogai’s and ā€˜mogai identities’ as though they’re some kind of joke. They talk about it like it’s the worst thing you could be to them.

Again, there is nothing wrong with the term. It’s just too inclusive and encompassing for them. They can’t cause a rift in that community if that’s the acronym. They can’t cut portions out of an ever-expanding community if all the identities are contained within it automatically.

Their current reasoning is ā€˜it includes pedophiles’ which is a blatant lie (The original coiner was a minor at the time they coined it and they’re also a CSA survivor). The other reasoning I’ve seen is ā€˜it includes cis and straight women’ (It doesn’t). They have NO real reason to reject that term, especially as it was created to BE the umbrella term they claimed to want so desperately without ā€˜being a slur’. And yet, they do. Because it’s too inclusive. ā€œQueer is a slurā€ is at this point, a deflect. They need it to be a slur because it’s too inclusive. They can’t cause a rift in the queer community if the word used for the community is all-encompassing. Just like they need MOGAI to include people it never did, so they can safely reject the label that was just too inclusive for their liking, too difficult to cause rifts in. They need these terms to be dangerous, bad, ā€˜problematic’ or a slur, because they need us to not have an encompassing umbrella if they are going to maintain their gatekeeping.

new rule if you say shit like ā€˜i don’t care about ace discourse either way’ and then do weird shit like, reblogging both positivity for ace people but also those ā€œlol, look this ace said something cringeyā€ posts, i unfollow you. i don’t like playing this guessing game of ā€˜yeah they just reblogged something gross from someone who thinks aces are fucking ā€œinvadersā€, except they haven’t explicitly shared the same sentiment yet, so maybe they’re still ok to follow?ā€. or like, ā€œsure it’s a punchline about aces being homophobic/transphobic/incels (fucking what?) but maybe they meant this person specifically and not as a group?ā€ it’s a huge source of anxiety feeling like i’m just waiting for you to share the same sentiment.

i definitely Get You that Discourse Tumblr is a garbage fire and an endless source of anxiety and i do a lot to distance itself from it now. but like. if you don’t want to have a ā€œdiscourse stanceā€ then like… those cringey ace memes are a discourse stance. it means ace people who read your blog get to be subjected to this same guessing game

transhamlet:

concept: bring backĀ ā€œsexuality is fluidā€ but not in aĀ ā€œit’s ok to coerce people to be something they’re notā€ way, and instead in aĀ ā€œthe boundaries between gay/bi/trans experiences are not as strict as separatist bloggers would like to make you thinkā€ way, and also a ā€œthere is no shame in someone changing how they identifyā€ way

calypsolemon:

hot take: the idea that access to rights, community, resources, and aid being limited and therefore it’s necessary to force out groups who don’t need themĀ ā€œas muchā€ is something that’s been ingrained in us from living in a capitalist society that hands us rights and resources as though they are privileges to be earned

the “aces stole the colour purple” discourse is back. This time the discourse is “Purple means sapphic love only and aces are erasing our history by using it”.. and like guys its a colour bi also has purple and men can use that so I don’t see why they aren’t arguing against that.. just aces

justaphobethings:

image

(via)

[id: an edit from that superman learn how to count book, lex luthor has the ace flag over his head and the text reads “When no one was looking, aces stole the colour purple. And that’s terrible.”]

i want to add, it’s specifically violet that’s a symbol of love between women. bc of the flower appearing in Sappho’s poetry, it’s been a gift that you give to a girl to tell her you like her for centuries. the purples on the bi and ace flags are just different purples, they’re not meant to depict violet at all.

aceaventurine:

SayingĀ ā€œWell, the Q is for Questioning!ā€ is not enough to make the community a safe place for questioning people.

It’s great to include them, but it doesn’t mean a lot if in the meantime you constantly joke about people having an oppression fetish, trying to opt-out of their privilege out of guilt, or being silly cishets desperatly wanting to be ā€œkweerā€ to be cool.

cookie-sheet-toboggan:

fun fact: you don’t actually support ace-wlw if you can’t support their ace identity Independent of their gay one. you don’t get to accept their love for girls while overlooking the fact that they’re on the ace-spectrum and call it support for their queer identity. if you don’t support aces you don’t support ace-wlw.

linguisticparadox:

theelderscrotes:

theelderscrotes:

theelderscrotes:

theelderscrotes:

i feel like the lgbt community is only suddenly aĀ ā€˜community’ on tumblr when its convenient so they can defend their imaginary territory over ace kids wanting to be accepted

where the fuck was this supposed solidarity when i felt like an inhuman piece of garbage while coming to terms with being nb and seeing literally no nbĀ ā€˜ā€™ā€™ā€™resources’’’’

exclusionists can fuckin eat me stop basing your sense of community over who you think doesn’t belong and take care of your goddamn own

all exclusionism discourse does is pop up relentlessly to scared and confused kids just trying to learn about themselves and feel like they belong somewhere. its not a good fucking community if people have to wade through drama to get scraps of actual support from your clique-y asses

I’ve seen them say ā€œWhy can’t the aces have a separate but allied community???ā€ and like…that is literally what the LGBT+ community IS. A bunch of separate (often overlapping and intersecting, true, because humans are multi-dimensional) communities allied together against a multifaceted common enemy.

At least, we SHOULD be allies. But somehow we always end up wasting our energy fighting each other.

acelaurakinney:

acelaurakinney:

the funniest thing about ace discourse is that some people rlly think calling ace people incels is going to make the community a safer place and incite real world change.Ā 

i made a donald trump aroace moodboard on tumblr dot edu and the trevor project stopped supporting ace people and providing resources to them.

be the change you want to see.Ā