clitcheese:

should uncle iroh be classed as a dilf or gilf. Discuss

wikipedia says he’s 65, which sounds like he’s on the cusp of gilfness. does anyone know the official dilf/gilf cutoff points. is it categorised by age alone or is it more like, a state of mind

clitcheese:

clitcheese:

clitcheese:

and today in the far right’s fantasy universe we’re talking decentralised monarchy

this and anarcho-capitalism are different wordings for the same idea of β€œfeudalism and we all agree to pretend that serfs are serfs due to their own personal failings and the king just works harder than anyone else”

i’m all for small government but also i just want to own human beings u know

a small government as in, i’m the divine ruler. That way, i don’t get taxed, the government can’t tell me what to do, but I still get all the power that my ego tells me i deserve because I Work Hard, and Capitalism Told Me That I Deserve Total Control Over Other People’s Lives If I Work Hard

clitcheese:

clitcheese:

and today in the far right’s fantasy universe we’re talking decentralised monarchy

this and anarcho-capitalism are different wordings for the same idea of β€œfeudalism and we all agree to pretend that serfs are serfs due to their own personal failings and the king just works harder than anyone else”

i’m all for small government but also i just want to own human beings u know

clitcheese:

clitcheese:

and today in the far right’s fantasy universe we’re talking decentralised monarchy

this and anarcho-capitalism are different wordings for the same idea of β€œfeudalism and we all agree to pretend that serfs are serfs due to their own personal failings and the king just works harder than anyone else”

this dude was saying “monarchy was originally decentralised” (before later despotism whatever the fuck he means by that) which i figure means, not all political power was given to the monarch like a straight dictatorship, as individual landowners have their own power to control their own subjects.

which is like, just how you enforce the monarchy’s rule. the monarchy giving out the power to enforce itself isn’t actually a division of political power.

unless this guy’s definition of “decentralisation” is like, instead of one king with one royal line, we have multiple groups perpetually stabbing each other in the back in order to crown themselves the ultimate ruler, and That’s how we decentralise because then it’s not one singular power. because, that’s also straight up typical feudalism. i don’t know how to decode any of this

clitcheese:

and today in the far right’s fantasy universe we’re talking decentralised monarchy

this and anarcho-capitalism are different wordings for the same idea of “feudalism and we all agree to pretend that serfs are serfs due to their own personal failings and the king just works harder than anyone else”