This Union Busting Manual From Office Depot is Really Something

rowantheexplorer:

goodzillo:

narkomgay:

alesisqx49:

Capitalism is only sustainable through a system of violence and social control

I still have a copy of the t*rget team lead guide to dealing with union activity that I nicked from the office when I worked there, itโ€™s mostly the same stuff but it also revealed just how much of their management tactics were intended to frustrate any unionizing activity. For instance, they said that cross-training in multiple departments was the best way to get reliable hours, and encouraged everyone to do it; according to the manual, however, it was their way of keeping departments mixed up and jumbled, making it impossible for any single department to unionize (and forcing anyone who wanted to unionize to get the entire store to do it).

And thatโ€™s just part what the store managers are taught. Throughout, it mentions holding off on action and consulting a labor relations officer in the company on how to proceed. Who knows what kind of shady shit the people a step above do?

If youโ€™re in retail and wondering how to go about unionizing, contact an existing retail workers union.

Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Unionย (US)

United Food & Commercial Workers Unionย (US/Canada)

Union of Shop, Distributive, and Allied Workersย (UK)

Retail and Fast Food Workers Union (Australia)

FIRST Union (NZ)

They are all veryย familiar with the anti-union tactics of retail owners and managers, and will have some advice for you, some literature to distribute, and strategies to counter these tactics. It has historically been extremely hard for retail and fast food employees to unionize specifically because the owners and managers keep us scared, disorganized, and are happy to fire us for unionizing, labor laws be damned. Their entire business model hinges on us being overworked and underpaid. Contact a union for help organizing in your store.

This Union Busting Manual From Office Depot is Really Something

certified-coolkid:

roadhonk:

once a month I loudly lament the fact that itโ€™s extremely hard to wear my favorite shirt in public

Description: a picture of a shirt featuring spongebob screaming and cop car emojis on fire. Text at the top and bottom reads โ€œ๐ŸšซLIFE IS A FUCKING SCAM๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿšซ5500 YEARS OF CIVILIZATION๐Ÿšซโ€ Under which it says โ€œ๐ŸšซWE SAY โ€˜NO MORE!‘๐Ÿšซโ€ overย โ€œFUCK OFFโ€

image–descriptions:

mash-loves-bats:

thefingerfuckingfemalefury:

elfwreck:

schmaniel:

maxiesatanofficial:

patrickat:

Gee, I wonder what in the world happened just prior to 1945 that would have led to this conclusion.

this motherfucker explained why โ€œso much for the tolerant leftโ€ was bullshit seventy years ago and people still wonโ€™t cut it out

โ€œIntolerance of bigotry is not comparable to intolerance of humanityโ€

Tolerance Is Not a Moral Precept:ย 
โ€œTolerance is not a moral absolute; it is a peace treaty. Tolerance is a social norm because it allows different people to live side-by-side without being at each otherโ€™s throats. It means that we accept that people may be different from us, in their customs, in their behavior, in their dress, in their sex lives, and that if this doesnโ€™t directly affect our lives, it is none of our business. But the model of a peace treaty differs from the model of a moral precept in one simple way: the protection of a peace treaty only extends to those willing to abide by its terms. It is an agreement to live in peace, not an agreement to be peaceful no matter the conduct of others. A peace treaty is not a suicide pact.โ€

We need to stop thinking of tolerance as a matter of ethical values, and move it to the same category as privacy: if someone is buying bomb parts and setting off explosions in their back yard, the neighbors may try to find out if theyโ€™re a danger to the whole community.ย 

Bigots are a danger to the whole community; they donโ€™t get the polite treatment we offer to people who are just trying to live their lives in peace.

THIS THO

ALL OF THIS

I wrote an essay on the tolerance paradox for school! Very interesting.

[id: a Wikipedia article on the paradox of tolerance.ย  It says, โ€œThe paradox of tolerance, first described by Karl Popper in 1945, is a decision theory paradox.ย  The paradox states that if a society is tolerant without limit, their ability to be tolerant will eventually be seized or destroyed by the intolerant.ย  Popper came to the seemingly paradoxical conclusion that in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance.โ€

/end id]