toadstoolfuel:

mormonfries:

mormonfries:

mormonfries:

“asexuality is just SSRIs” is stupid half-baked tinfoil hat shit and just because a popular blog said it doesn’t mean it’s anywhere close to true

it’s literally the Woke version of ‘people are trans cause they eat soy’

for those of you who were lucky enough not to see this absolutely ass-lick discourse

there’s a lot of garbage to unpack here but i think my biggest confusion is like….. so what??? if ssris make ur life livable but ur not really interested in sex anymore and being part of the ace community brings u joy……. so fucking what???

like apart from the myriad of logical fallacies all clamoring for attention n this hell concept……. ur real, honest to god concern is………. “these teenagers don’t want to kill themselves but uhhhhh, they don’t really wanna have sex either,,,,,, and they’ve created a community that helps them accept themselves……… guys this is serious fucking business”

like that’s some nice suburban white mom “vaccines cause autism” bullshit, brenda, but most of us have real problems

it’s also such typical bullshit that they decide that sexualities are so static and permanent that they’re phrasing a change or realisation of sexuality as an illusion. like asexuality is a facade that must be distracting you from your One True Orientation.

sexuality can change. it happens to a lot of people. sometimes bc of your meds or hormones. sometimes bc of trauma. sometimes bc you’re just growing up and changing as a person, or because you have the vocab you didn’t have before. it’s such a weird version of identity politics that anything about you that’s temporary or that ever changes must be False, and also you’re a Faker.

also, they’re talking about libido anyway. because why should a community decide what it stands for, that’s other people’s jobs.

mormonfries:

mormonfries:

mormonfries:

“asexuality is just SSRIs” is stupid half-baked tinfoil hat shit and just because a popular blog said it doesn’t mean it’s anywhere close to true

it’s literally the Woke version of ‘people are trans cause they eat soy’

for those of you who were lucky enough not to see this absolutely ass-lick discourse

aviculor:

eddrian32:

happy-slug:

scarcity-of-cats:

countersignal:

scarcity-of-cats:

The tactic of invoking the other person’s blog description to discredit them in an argument really serves to show that conservatives fundamentally don’t understand what it means for something to be embarrassing.

Whenever rightists throw out another person’s description for cringe points it’s usually something like “Skye. 20. She/her/hers. Pansexual socialist. #BLM” meanwhile rightist blog descriptions are like “34-YEAR-OLD PROUD STRAIGHT WHITE MAN (GASP! HOW DARE I?), AK-47 GENDER PEW/PEWS/PEWSELF, AMBASSADOR OF KEKISTAN. PREPARE TO BE TRIGGERED, TUMBLRINAS”

You’re just proving my point, dumbass.

Holy SHit

life imitates art