The fascinating story of the first lesbian magazine in North America, plus where to read it
Tag: queer history
[nita] munus-ra munus nita-ra ku-ku-dĆØ įµinanna za-kam
trans.Ā āto transform men into women and women to men is yours, inanna.ā from in-nin Å”a-gur-ra. enheduanna, ca. 2250 BCE (via patrexes)
ok, so I was gonna infodump in the tags, but I think this is important enough to talk about on the post itself.
Inanna was the supreme Goddess of ancient Sumer, a region of what is now known as the middle east. She was a queen who ventured into the underworld to save her husband, and came back alive. (Her story is one of the many pre-Christian stories of death and rebirth/resurrection.) She was heavily revered, more so than any male god at the time (even though she did have a male consort, as mentioned before).
Enheduanna was a priestess to Inanna. Not only was she one of the first (if not the first) priests or priestesses whose names are still known today, but she was actually one of the first authors to still have her name still preserved. Pretty much all the writing we have that was from before her time was written by anonymous scribes or chisel-workers; her writing is the oldest (or one of the oldest) with a name attached to the writer.
Itās already known that many ancient and Indigenous societies accepted trans people, butā¦seeing writing thatās pretty clearly supposed to be about trans people, written by the oldest, most ancient priestess we know of, which says that trans people are under the *direct* care and domain of the most important goddess in the society of that priestessā¦sure is something.
(via earthmoonlotus)
thanks for adding some context! hereās actually some more, because iām real fucking weak for inanna.Ā
trans people played a major part as priestesses and other staff in her cult (itās even been argued that trans people were the onlyĀ people who served as her cultic staff, though thatās generally received with some discontent). transness was considered inexplicably tied to the goddess and imparted by her in some respect, as we see from erra IV,Ā ālĆŗ kur-Äar-ra lĆŗ issini Å”a ana
Å”uplu niÅ”e iÅ”tar zikarussunu uteru ana sinniÅ”utiā, trans.Ā āthe kurÄarru and assinu, the people beneath iÅ”tar/inanna whom she has transformed from virile men into womenā.Ā
now, note, all of the english translations of erra IV iāve come across (iām mostly affording my own translations here, because people use slurs a lot when they translate sumero-akkadian and i aināt about that life) add something likeĀ āin order to strike fear into the peopleā when quoting that transliteration, but a) thereās nothing in that passage i can figure to get that meaning and b) that description is inconsistent with other descriptions of the kurÄarru and assinu (who are also called,
variably, gala, pilipili, sag-ur-sag, kalu, kuluāu, and ur-sal). inĀ āthe descent of inanna to the underworldā, we see the creation of the first of these by enki for the indisposed inanna: as you noted, inanna does indeed survive the trip, and it is solely because of her explicitly transgender priestesses.Ā
[the gala-tur and
kur-Äar-ra] flitted through the door [to the underworld] like flies. they slipped through the door pivots like phantoms. [ā¦]
[ereÅ”-ki-gal-la] asked: āwho are you? i tell you from my heart to your heart, from my body to your body ā if you are gods, i will talk with you; if you are mortals, may a destiny be decreed for you.ā they made her swear this by heaven and earth.
they were offered a river with its water ā they did not accept it. they were offered a field with its grain ā they did not accept it.
they said to her: āgive us the corpse hanging on the hook.ā
shining ereÅ”-ki-gal-la answered the gala-tur and
kur-Äar-ra:Ā āthe corpse is that of your queen.ā
they said to her:Ā āwhether it is that of our king, or whether it is that of our queen, give it to us.ā
they were given the corpse hanging on a hook. [the kur-Äar-ra] sprinkled on it the life-giving plant, and the other the life-giving water. and thus, inanna rose.
when the fuck have your faves ever, am i right?Ā
and, hell, inanna herself in aĀ Å”ir-namÅ”ub (āincantation hymnā; a hymn or poem written in voice, for the sake of performance) says this: āeĀ kaÅ”-a-ka tuÅ”
-a-[Äu-ne] / nu-nus-Äen
Å”ul giri-zal-la me-e-Äen-[na]ā, trans.Ā āto sit in the tavern, i go as a woman [or] i go as a joyful young manā.
(via patrexes)
idk if this has been posted yet but i read this threadĀ by @teamarimoĀ and found it SUPER interesting and thorough and thought itād be good to share it
ātransgender is a culturally specific termā itās really not
two-spirit is a culturally specific term. hijra is a culturally specific term. genderfuck, in the sense of a term with particular, intentional political and social connotations, is a culturally specific term. transgender is an umbrella term encompassing a myriad of experiences from any and all cultures should someone feel like itās valuable to their identity, and people who were born before the word ever got coined can and should still be considered trans, because to do otherwise serves no purpose but to suppress the knowledge that people like us have always existed, and the only thing that can do is harm
hey thanks for saying this in a really clear way
i had asked a roman historian about the roman emperor that may have been a trans lady and the historian tried to tell me that we canāt put labels on historical figures and also that the romans had called this emperor a woman to slander them and i was just. so fucking pissed. better to misgender them or wash away all references to trans people in history than to, what, maybe put a label on somebody? fuck that.
anyway thanks for saying this and if itās okay with you iād like to use this if i come across that historian again because UGH
elagabalus/marcia aurelia? yeah lmao i mean rome isnt my area but while damnatio memoriae was certainly used against her there are iirc more than solely roman texts attesting to her gender, so likeā¦. take that as u will, by which i mean she was a trans girl and you can rip that out of my cold dead hands
[nita] munus-ra munus nita-ra ku-ku-dĆØ įµinanna za-kam

āAs the gay movement expands and becomes more assimilated, people who are not so easily assimilated will feel marginalized. Their marginalization creates another round of resistance. Itās an inefficient and somewhat embarrassing process, but itās also extremely invigorating and democratic.ā ā Jeffrey Escoffier, July 1994
.
Picture: Sylvia Rivera leads the alternative Stonewall 25 march, New York City, June 26, 1994. Photo Ā© AP.
.
For many in the gay, lesbian, and bisexual communities, the massive celebrations surrounding the 25th anniversary of Stonewallāculminating in the Stonewall 25 Parade on June 26, 1994, twenty-three years ago todayāwere a hard-earned opportunity to reflect on how far the gay community had come since 1969. For many others, however, Stonewall 25 was yet another example of the mainstream queer communityās myopic vision of āgay liberation.ā
.
A number of militant groupsāincluding ACT UP, the Lesbian Avengers, Spirit of Stonewall (SOS), and Transgender Menaceāvoiced their frustrations with the official march, and a coalition formed.
.
āQueers have been getting thrown out of things for years by straight people,ā SOS member Bill Dobbs said, āand now gay people are getting on their high horses and throwing some gay people out of the movement.ā
.
Most clearly excluded from the main events was the transgender community; Stonewall 25, for example, was officially a āGay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Eventā despite calls for inclusion of āTransgenderā in the title. In response, and in recognition of her decades of tireless activism, Sylvia Rivera was asked to lead the alternative march.
.
Most sources today incorrectly provide that Rivera was honored at Stonewall 25, implying that the official organization recognized her contributions to the movement. While participants in the alternative march gave Rivera the respect she earned, it is not the case that she was honored by Stonewall 25 itself. #HavePrideInHistory #Resist #Pride2017 (at Flatiron Building)
Whatās with this rhetoric thatĀ āitās always just been LGBTā thatās cropping up?Ā
Iāve seenĀ āLGBā andĀ āLGā with my own damn eyes, I remember the goddamn bi-discourse that still goddamn crops up, I remember reading old articles about whether or not the coalition should include them, youāre trying to convince me that I just hallucinated that shit? And they have the gall to claim IāM the one doing historical revisionism here?
More to the point, how the hell do you think a full coalition can just spring up out of the ground fully formed like that before the concept of Bisexuality as a distinct identity was even codified? Anyone who claims otherwise are either misled or actively lying about the issue to preserve the illusion that LGBT is this immutable concept that emerged from the collective subconscious fully formed and it disregards all the hard work it took people to build the coalition into what it is currently. Itās not only historically inaccurate, thatās just plain not how shit works.
Like thatās right up there withĀ āthey donāt belong because they arenāt inherently LGBTā as if it isnāt an artificial coalition. Weak-ass arguments intended to sidestep the ACTUAL matter at hand.
Wasnāt it earlier this year they were talking about dropping the T? Again?!
They wanna Drop the T because they think Republicans are using our Identity Politics as ammunition against the Oberfell thing or something.
They stand on the Shoulders of Marsha P. Johnson to get this far only for them to cut us off from the larger community when we ask for Help. We āInconvenienceā them and they cut us off. And they white wash away the Footprints they made on our shoulders.
I keep seeing this ridiculous idea that LGBT as an acronym sprung up because of Stonewall, so that anyone who says the T wasnāt always there can be accused of erasing the trans women at the event. itās 3 separate decades of history theyāre compressing into a soundbite.
“trans people have existed the entire time” yo i studied greek and roman literature in college and this dude Lucian (2nd century CE) wrote a piece called Dialogue of the Courtesans and one chapter called “The Lesbians” (unfortunately misnamed) has a courtesan named Leaina tell about a lover she had named Megilla who was AFAB but preferred to be called Megillus and presented himself as male and insisted in very detailed dialogue he was male in every way except for his birth, check it out
thank you! itās seriously ridiculous how terfs think trans people just popped up in the sixties?? like?? talk about not knowing your own history
thereās also the Cult of Cybele, an important religion to the Roman empire that had a priestess-hood made up of trans women. Catallus, a very famous latin author, wrote about their mythology, where apparently dysphoria is treated as a sacred calling from the goddess. Hereās my fave translation, itĀ doesnāt add in any unnecessary misgendering that wasnāt there in latin, because apparently translators feel the need to do that sometimes. TW for descriptions of intense dysphoria, and a gorey description of ancient bottom surgery.
a good rule of thumb is that if you see the wordĀ āeunuchā in a history book, thatās usually a reference to trans women thatās been lost in time thanks to the rise of Christianity.
old lesbian messaging was super vague and ominous i Love It
xoxoxo
84 Years.
84 years ago today.
Nazis burned most of the research on trans identities from the world. They burned Magnus Hirschfeldās work from the Institute for Sexual Research.
Well, motherfuckers, weāre still here.
They burned upwards of 25,000 books on May 10th, 1933.














