Iām always a little baffled when liberals will see leftists doing something and object out of the fear that the right willĀ āuse it as justificationā to do xyz oppressive shit.
because likeā¦ literally 100% of the time they already are doing that exact oppressive thing, and thereās centuries of evidence that they will just make up justification when they donāt find anything concrete to blame it on anyway
organizing to combat voter suppression isnāt the cause of voter suppression.Ā
organizing to prevent fascist groups from terrorizing communities isnāt the cause of fascism.Ā
advocating for the end of boarders isnāt the cause of the United States government deporting peopleĀI donāt understand how so many people have been convinced that any advocacy or organizing is the cause of oppression instead of the fight against it. How do you consistently mix up cause and effect this much?Ā
So much of liberal rhetoric is focused not on stopping or combatting what is happening, but instead on trying to get the referee to notice that the other side isnt playing fair so theyāll step in and put things back *~*the way they should be*~* and so a lot of the time when they say that the right would āuse _____ as justificationā for something, what they really mean on some level is ā_______ could be said to provoke that response, and as soon as we do anything to provoke, we no longer have the moral high groundā
and of course there is no referee ā thereās nobody standing outside the system who is empowered to step in and throw a flag when somebody is ācheating.ā But they just canāt get past the illusion that if they point out enough times that the right is breaking laws or acting badly, then somebody (with the appropriate authority) will step in and do something about it
This is also the very real impulse lurking behind all of those joking posts on fb from liberals going like ādamn I wish the queen would just take the US backā because the idea that the British royal family, the last body that controlled America from the outside, could step in and stop everything bad is much more appealing than the thought that if they want change theyāre going to have to do the hard work of making it themselves
#thatās not even getting into how they totally ignore the atrocities perpetuated by the british crown#like a little genocide and imperialism doesnāt matter at least she doesnāt sound UNCOUTH on the television#when
ppl say shit like that it makes it clear they do not give a fuck abt
the actual oppression occurring just that the Cheeto Manā¢ is Rude (via)
Tag: racism
Has anyone read any – positive or negative – takes on āRosaā by black fans or black writers? Iād be interested in reading posts or articles (or seeing twitter threads or youtube videos) that arenāt just white people telling each other that the episode was great.
I thought it was a great episode, much more detailed and historically accurate than I expected. I do wish it had mentioned Claudette Colvinās part of the story, as the one who ignighted the bus boycott with her previous, less peaceful, arrest and conviction.
Iāve read a lot of white criticism of the episode on Reddit and Twitter over the last couple days, and while many posts say they donāt like being spoon fed a story, an equal amount missed major points that shouldnāt have needed to have been even more spelled out. For example, Rosa was clearly portrayed as an activist in the inner circle of the civil rights movement. Martin Luther King Jr wasnāt at her house randomly because all Black people know each other ā they were meeting.
And yet I keep seeing people complaining that Rosa was āmisrepresentedā because she was in reality an activist. Or that she was āchosenā as the face of the movement, as if she was a puppet and not an active participant herself. (Which really goes to show how nonblack people will twist information in order to put it in a bad light ā a lot of people seem to think that because she was an activist, the whole thing was faked. Thatās misrepresentation).
Another pain point Iāve seen is the time traveling villain, whose name I donāt even remember. Scruffy white guy sent back in time to stop the bus boycott. His motivation? Racism. So why are so many complaining he had no motivation? And why is racism considered a āboringā trait for a sci-fi villain? Especially since when I post about racism in media and fandom, people act like itās the most over the top suggestion (because racism is something only Evil People do)? Thereās nothing worse when someone thinks theyāre being called racist, but when a mass murdering villain is openly racist, thatās not a good reason to be a villain.
I wonāt even get into the people who wanted to āunderstandā the white space villain better. Or the ones who call him a dumb villain because heās from the far future, and obviously racism wouldnāt be a thing in his time (or maybe racism is something that isnāt exclusive to the US in the ā50s? Maybe itās not just going to go away by itself over time?). Like, no stopping and thinking about the implications, just, no, thereās no racism in whatever future world this villain we just met came from.
Which, of course, goes hand in hand with complaints that Ryan and Yazās talk about the racism theyāve experienced in the present day UK was unnecessary and āheavy handed.ā It was absolutely necessary for a British show exploring an American civil rights event to do that.
Anyway. Episode was great. A lot of the reactions, not so much.
āThe evil trans agenda is being financed by a shadowy cabal of billionaires and they all just happen to be Jewishā yeah I think we can all tell who youāve been listening to
Iām really glad this anti-Confederate backlash has picked up steam, because weāve allowed Confederate apologists to completely seize control of Civil War history. The fact that we even think of it in terms of āNorth vs. Southā or āUnion vs. Confederacyā is a sign of that influence. It should be āAmericaās Slaveowner Revolt.ā We ask questions like āwhat if the South won the warā, as if that was remotely possible given their numbers and logistical failures. The Confederacy was barely a government. Within a year of forming there were riots from food shortages. The whole notion that this was between two equally formidable and legitimate sides is a fallacy of the so-called Lost Cause.
This isnāt griping from a history buff by the way, the Lost Cause has been one of Americaās chief guardians of white supremacy for 150 years. The Big Lie about states rights affects politics to this day, and always in the context of letting states curtail civil rights that the federal government has guaranteed. Prior to the Civil War, when Northern states tried to push back against fugitive slave laws and make themselves sanctuaries for runaway slaves, the government cracked down hard on them. There was not a peep about states rights on that. We see it happening today. The states rights scolds have not said a word about Jeff Sessions threatening to destroy cities that refuse to hunt undocumented immigrants. Yet somehow the rights of states become sacrosanct when they want to keep gay couples from adopting kids. All of this is relevant to our current situation, and hopefully taking down some statues of (frankly overrated) treasonous generals is just the beginning.
joanne k rowling, woke intersectionalist: hey bud. listen. you know that evil snake named after an indian story? the one who died? well hehā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ get thisā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ sheās actually a korean womanā¦ā¦ who shapeshifts. turns out we had strong representasian after all huh? you poc women are going to love this *checks off ācho changā on her mile-long list of sins*
me, a korean woman who just wants to forget: how did you get in my house
jk rowling making nagini an asian woman in canon is really sending me. you made this asian lady the pet of a nazi inspired character and then had her beheaded by some cracker boy i-
j.k.r. needs like one close friend to sit her down and go: āokay, but, go over this with me again. you decided the evil snake your dark wizard kept as a pet and vessel of his fragmented horrific soul – the one that has to be murdered in order to defeat the evil wizard – is in factā¦.an asian woman who was cursed to eventually become a beast and monster in her own body. am i getting this right? the asian woman turns into a snake because her bloodline is cursed and then she becomes the pet of a white supremacist with magic. you invented a body curse specificallyĀ for turning women into monsters and your first thought was not like, subversion of fairy tale misogyny butā¦.to add a layer of racism? just trying to understand here.āĀ
The thing about baseline nationalism – not even āradicalā nationalism, just that sort of normal set of underlying nationalist principles that everyone adheres to who believes in the legitimacy of nation-states, which is most people – is that you donāt even need to say, for instance, āitās okay for the government to put people in camps and torture them because theyāre not Australian.ā You donāt even need to formulate that as a coherent thought in a way that might result in you dealing with it, because itās simply taken for granted as a fundamental truth. Your brain does you the favor of gliding right over it so you can get on with writing your internet screed about how the conditions āprobably arenāt that badā and people are only attempting suicide and children are only falling comatose as a trick to be allowed into Australian hospitals, which just proves even more they shouldnāt be allowed to come here, on and on, etc. etc.
It is a mistake to think that only extreme nationalists, only violent nationalists, are the problem. The normal everyday nationalism that is so commonplace we often donāt even register it as being nationalism is – perhaps after gender – the most widespread and deeply entrenched system on this planet for licensing violence done by others, for turning violence into something sanitary and bureaucratic and amoral, for allowing people who are not fundamentally indecent to nevertheless avert their eyes from damning evidence of human suffering. It is a social pathology. A disease.
A Side Effect Of ‘School Safety’: Children Are Being Tasered For Misbehavior
Reports of violence against students by school police officers.Ā
A Side Effect Of ‘School Safety’: Children Are Being Tasered For Misbehavior
Child Refugees Sent To A Tiny Pacific Island Are Becoming Unconscious From Their Trauma
Sorry to link to buzzfeed but i want peter duttonās head on a pike
should note that nauru banned facebook because refugees were using it m to spread awareness
Dr Nick Kowalenko, who chairs the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry international relations subcommittee at the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Child Psychiatrists, said that environmental features of pervasive refusal syndrome ā including trauma, parental mental illness, and a pervading sense of hopelessness ā have been the reality for years for the kids on Nauru.
āPeople can endure difficulties if thereās an anticipated hopeful outcome, a light at the end of the tunnel,ā Kowalenko said. āBut the dawning experience on a lot of those families and kids is thatās not the case.ā
the explicit point of australiaās immigration policy, the explicit point of the way the detention centers on nauru and manus island have been run, is to provoke a sense of hopelessness. the trauma being done to these children is not even an accidental byproduct of conditions at the camps: it is an intended and inevitable consequence of the way the system is run, because it is a system designed to traumatise, regardless of the number of euphemisms deployed to design that fact
the stories in this article are proof positive that the people running australiaās immigration system are doing so competently and effectively
Child Refugees Sent To A Tiny Pacific Island Are Becoming Unconscious From Their Trauma
šš§ (archive) 