Tag: text

You know, with the rise of the “bottom/vers/top” memes in the lgbt community, I want to bring up something…

bakuryo:

Minors, please be careful. I can’t stop you from using these memes. No one can. But be aware of who you use them with. If you make a joke of the like with an adult, and they reply pushing the “joke” further – it’s a big red flag. If an adult uses these memes with you, run. If possible, try avoiding using them with adults too – it’s not your responsibility, it’s true. But better safe than sorry.

This also stands between minors of different ages – a 13 year old is a minor. So is a 17 year old. Is it okay for a 17 year old to tell a 13 year old that they’ll be their (insert x/y/z alignement)? Absolutely not. Be mindful of your age gaps, be mindful of the differences in maturity between you. And stay safe.

This is okay to reblog, and I highly encourage it, especially from adults.

marsixm:

heres the idea: instead of vogue magazine it’s vague magazine. all the editorials are blurry. models shot from 60 feet away. ads just say “buy it”. models hide behind trees and shrubs. you can’t tell what anyone’s wearing.

class-struggle-feminism:

the-laissez-fairest-of-them-all:

tilthat:

TIL in 1981, the Brazilian dictatorship planned an attack to an event attended by 20k people. The 2 soldiers that carried the attack made a mistake and ended up blowing the bomb on themselves (1 dead, 1 injured). The attack was planned to convince the country that left-wing guerrilas were a threat.

via reddit.com

You antifa soyboys hear that? This is why nobody is afraid of you.

imagine having reading comprehension thats this bad

aphobehaterofficial:

sentientviolets:

I saw that one advert supporting autism $peaks that said sth like “it costs $60,000 more per year to care for a person with autism” and let me tell you.

those figures only made me feel like a burden on my family. my first thought wasn’t “this is something in support of autistic people!” it was “do I really cost my family that much?”

it’s not like the advert gave legitimate sources for that statistic. it’s not like they made it clear what the donations going to autism $peaks would be used for. it mostly just made us out to be a burden.

that advert wasn’t “help autistic people”, it was “give sympathy points to caregivers who have to deal with an autistic person”.

it didn’t read like “we’re here to help people!”. it read like “look how awful it is to deal with an autistic person”.

it didn’t paint us as people, it painted us as problems.

that’s the issue present in all adverts published by or in support of autism $peaks. the goal isn’t to help us. it’s not about the autistic people. it’s about the caregivers. it’s about making sure the general public thinks society is better of without autistic people.

it’s “look at this poor caregiver! their life wouldn’t be like this without that nasty autism!”

to support autism $peaks is to support the idea that autistic people are not people, but problems.

we are not a problem to be fixed. we are autistic people, and we don’t need autism $peaks to speak for us.

ALL CHILDREN NEED MONEY

NEEDING MONEY IS NOT EXCLUSIVE TO AUTISTIC CHILDREN

lesserjoke:

fleetwoodbrak:

gollums loincloth is like 2 inches of toilet paper and he’s hopping around like disneys quasimodo doing acrobatics and we as an audience are narrowly spared from seeing his peepee but you cannot you CANNOT argue that sam and frodo didnt see it at least once!! they didn’t want to but they didn’t have things like camera angles to save them they probably saw gollums swinging little meat sack a hundred times and both of them just decided to never ever mention it

did they decide to never ever mention it or are they talking about it constantly every time the camera cuts away? we the audience get to decide and that’s why i think fiction is so powerful