star-divination:

haiku-robot:

wonderfulworldofmichaelford:

curiooftheheart:

wonderfulworldofmichaelford:

curiooftheheart:

wonderfulworldofmichaelford:

curiooftheheart:

matt-the-blind-cinnamon-roll:

slapandticklelol:

โ€œThis poem doesnโ€™t rhyme.โ€

Dude about to make haikus:

โ€œOh you havenโ€™t heard?โ€

fuck you

The first line is six syllables.

THIS

POEM

DOES-Nโ€™T

RHYME

Thatโ€™s 5 syllables

Poem is two syllables. Po-em.

Poem is ONE syllable, who the fuck uses two syllables to say poem?

What the fuck are you on about? Literally just say it out loud. Po-em. One syllable would be like Pome.

โ€œPomeโ€ IS how you say it you neanderthal. Who the fuck says PO-EM?

โ€œpomeโ€ is how you
say it you neanderthal who
the fuck says po-em


^Haiku^bot^9. I detect haikus with 5-7-5 format. Sometimes I make mistakes.

Disappointing each other includes you. | PayPal | Patreon

We have come full circle.

wodneswynn:

The problem with TERF rhetoric is that it inverts the whole shit about misogynistic and queerphobic violence and oppression. While misogynistic violence and oppression is its own thing due to its roots in women being seen archaically as a chattel class and later a particular underclass in so many societies, misogynistic and queerphobic violence and oppression are fundamentally linked in how their relationship to patriarchy plays out: Men committing these acts of violence is so pervasive because patriarchal society deputizes men to punish people who perform some real or perceived transgression against sexist and heteronormative social conventions.

So, youโ€™re over here talking about how I can never be a woman because I was โ€œsocialised maleโ€ when, between the two of us, youโ€™re the one filling the manโ€™s role.

machonaroja:

machonaroja:

machonaroja:

I think Iโ€™ve talked about this before but the demonization of polyamory by the gay community on tumblr is really weird and boring.

Like the way people talk about it on here youโ€™d think all polyamorous people are sex crazed abusive hets that are explicitly anti-lesbian or something but like,,, polyamory is and has been a significant part of the lesbian community for a long while and if you guys went outside for two seconds youโ€™d know that lol

Idk like Iโ€™ve dated girls who get all their lesbian politics from this hellsite who described polyamory as โ€œa toxic manifestation of queer theoryโ€ that was contrary to her marriage-gay ways, like, while we were dating and she knew I was polyamorous and like idk it just really weirds me out that you guys think thereโ€™s some weird either/or dichotomy here.

theparadoxspace:

Harry Potter v. 1.07 patch notes:

  • Representation previously only mentioned in social media is now made explicit
  • Ronโ€™s dialogue is now uncensored
  • Fixed bizarre bug that changed Arthur Rubeus Potterโ€™s name to Albus Severus
  • Fixed bug which made Harryโ€™s job say โ€œAurorโ€ instead of โ€œHogwartsโ€™ DADA Teacherโ€
  • Harry no longer returns to the Dursleyโ€™s after rescuing Sirius and instead goes with him
  • Severus Snape is no longer praised nor regarded in a nice manner in any instance
  • Professor McGonagallโ€™s Immortality is now implemented
  • โ€œThe Cursed Childโ€ is now completely removed from canon, as it was previously added by mistake.

s-notgirl:

And hey I personally fucking hate how terfs have tried to mutate lesbian culture on this site. The other day I saw someone talking about how whenever they see a blog with the lesbian pride flag in the icon, theyโ€™re uneasy or hesitant to interact/follow because of this awful trend of trans exclusionary radfems pushing wlw pride as a front for hatred, a way to boast theyโ€™re aย โ€œreal lesbian, unlike all those nasty str8 women who date trans womenโ€. Itโ€™s such an awful tactic because whenever they repost something sapphic, something about loving women, something that should be so good and wholesome and proud, that you should never have to question whether the intentions of it are cruel, theyโ€™re doing it spitefully, theyโ€™re not sayingย โ€œi love loving womenโ€ theyโ€™re sayingย โ€œi only respect those who I deem to be REAL womenโ€ and theyโ€™re turning pride into a discreet statement of hate. Lesbian culture and spaces are for all lesbians, and the fact that someone showing โ€œtoo much prideโ€ is now cause for suspicion is disgusting! But make no mistake, this isnโ€™t the fault of anyone but terfs. This isnโ€™t lesbians and trans women being lesbophobic, I agree that itโ€™s absolutely terrible for lesbians to see wlw pride and immediately feel suspicious, but itโ€™s not their fault, it is the fault of the people who are trying to slip into these communities and spread their poison by putting up a front of love and pride.

Stop taking a community based on love and pride and affection and trying to turn it into your platform for hate. These wlw communities are not for you. You cannot say you love women and then turn around and dedicate your entire online presence to hating women.

theroguefeminist:

theroguefeminist:

so i was under the impression that academia was a haven for queer studies but did you know practically no colleges (in the US anyway) offer straight up degrees in LGBT or queer studies? like you can minor in it at a few schools or have a concentration in it through other programs like gender or sexuality studies or in interdisciplinary programs, but in my research i have so far found ONE school that even offers a bachelorโ€™s in lgbt studiesโ€“and itโ€™s a small liberal arts college pretty much no one has heard of – it just goes to show how marginalized our histories and cultures still are

and this is particularly striking considering the heavy-weight academics who have done important scholarship relating to queer theory or lgbt history and areย  still big name faculty who draw applicants and prestige to these schools or, if theyโ€™re no longer alive, whose massive impact on academia remains to this day like Judith Butler, Foucault, Audre Lorde, Eve Sedgwick, June Jordan, Adrienne Rich, Sara Ahmed, Jack Halberstam, like the list goes on and onย 

academia is willing to benefit financially and academically from queer scholars but wonโ€™t invest funding or manpower into cultivating lgbt studies itself