Hey @ all radfems!!

trelesire:

fumbledeegrumble:

not-just-another-fake-lesbian:

Lets take back the ace discourse.

It started with us, and it’s gonna end with us. 

Genderists stole it from us and made it about keeping “cishets” out instead of straight people.

Ace people are not and will not ever be LGB for being ace.

I vote that we all start posting in the “ace discourse” tag about how we don’t want straight people in the community. I suggest creating our own tag?: “Terfs against ace inclusion” or something similar.

Post the similarities between “gay” and “lesbian” trans people(Straight GNC people) wanting in and ace people wanting in; such as neither of them experiencing same sex attraction and both of them needing to be included above actual LGB people.

Goal: Ace exlusionists realize what we’re doing is good and help us fight the trans cult.

I bet if we can get enough genderist ace exlusionists to join our cause, we’ll be much more able to get the homophobia and lesbophobia of trans and ace people wanting to be in the community to be much more well known.

Please Please Please Reblog this and spread it around radfem spaces! I think this could possibly actually work if it takes off!

Oh, I’d be more than happy to.

TERFs are out here trying to “take back” aphobia. Spread this shit like wildfire.

Where’s the “Don’t compare us to our oppressors” racket now lmao lmao lmao hahahahahahahahahHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

So why do you hate trans people?

aceusnavi:

discoursedumpster:

yaintlgbtpn:

disforce:

:

Just because I don’t think mogai gender identities are valid OR healthy doesn’t mean i hate trans people, Karen

Wait what id miss and what do you define as mogai genders do you mean like nounself type stuff or??

I made a post that was like “this pride month let’s destroy mogai” meaning microlabels like those on beyond-mogai-pride-flags and apparently that = hating trans people

How is saying that you want to destroy labels that only trans people use not hating trans people??

first of y’all yaintlgbtpn is a transphobe so jot that down

idiscourse:

disk–horse:

aphobic-hau:

aphobic-hau:

helpfulhardware:

online:

Tbh, I feel like inclusionists calling exclusionists terfs is directly meant to hurt trans and nb people
They have been told countless times that there is an overwhelming amount of trans and nb ppl on the exclusionist side yet they still call them terfs
They know what they’re doing, they know that what they’re saying is harmful they literally just don’t give a fuck about it
Inclusionists who compare exclusionists to terfs are awful, they will honestly say anything to hurt someone, like you can’t be so flippant when ur calling actual trans ppl terfs while you’re cis/cishet

nobody is saying exclusionists are terfs, we’re saying the rhetoric is the same verbatim

coming at u live from a nb person

I mean, if you get pissed b/c you think we’re calling you terfs when we say you’re using terf rhetoric, and you don’t immediatly evaluate the shit you say, welp.

If the shoe fits strut bih.

Wait, holy shit y’all op is cis. I knew this shit sounded Cispicious.

The Cispicious Stamp of Approval™.

Anyways y’all will never stop my trans ass from saying exclusionists and terfs are similar af and the Cisaster™ that is op can cry about it

softtrade:

rensieniltiac:

softtrade:

One feminist psychological definition of objectification is the combination of 1) extra scrutiny of women, leading to the 2) breaking down of visualizing women into discrete body parts, which 3) leads to mentally processing them more as a collection of organized objects than people.

I think it’s clear that trans women not only receive this sort of treatment from society (being explicitly broken down into body parts [‘sorry abt your dick’]), but also that people who pride themselves on subjecting trans women to extreme scrutiny in order to pick apart their individualized body parts to ascertain their assigned sex are enacting the exact definition of patriarchal and misogynist objectification

So you use the word “psychological” and think it’s enough to be tagged under psychology? I don’t see any psychology here.

Pdf version that explains the first paragraph of theory here, Study summary here. Sorry since ya know this is on my personal tumblr blog and I was on my phone, I don’t usually have footnotes to my thought processes.

But also I feel like you have no right to be condescending about psychology when this

is yr bio? Good luck on being both ill informed and a bitch tho