blackkandgayy:

positivityviolet:

I hope that all lesbians who once thought they were bi know that they aren’t contributing to the “bi is just a stepping stone to gay” stereotype. That stereotype was made up by straight people who refused to try to understand bisexuality. I also hope that all bi women who once thought they were lesbians know that they aren’t contributing to the “all lesbians must secretly like men” stereotype. Again, this was made up by straight people who refuse to try to understand lesbians. It’s not anyone’s responsibility in their journey of self discovery to dismantle every harmful stereotype along the way; sometimes you’re just figuring yourself out and get mixed up along the way and that’s okay. We have each other to support each other as wlw regardless of whether or not we got confused down the line at some point.

I needed this

pustluk:

“male-socialized children are allowed to have a childhood!” is an extremely strange argument to make about members of a demographic, who, regardless of education and political inclination, have consistently, publicly grieved personal histories in which they can’t locate themselves subjectively or which they can’t remember at all—a grief which is often construed specifically as “i didn’t have a childhood”.

but, you know, Believe Women!

that post about who prisons should/shouldn’t be for is really surreal like I Do Not and Probably Will Never Have The Spoons To Get Into It as much as this topic deserves but. it’s wild how leftists on this site see very clearly how

  1. police are corrupt, racist, ableist to their core, originally founded to capture escaped slaves and crush protests and riots
  2. police only exist to protect capitalist interests and, i guess to give the illusion of safety to white upper and middle class people
  3. criminalisation has always failed, always does more harm than good, and always targets marginalised groups. see the war on drugs, see how it hasn’t affected white people and our drug use in the slightest, see prohibition, see sex work
  4. prisons are dehumanising by design and do not act as a deterrent to potential criminals
  5. crime rates are a direct function of poverty and quality of life, and the presence of cops and Tough On Crime policies haven’t been proven to have any impact on crime at all
  6. all judicial systems are imperfect, and risk people being imprisoned for crimes they didn’t commit. this applies even in a perfect world to hypothetical courts free of all racism and biases, which we’re currently failing at

but we’re only up for prison abolition Until A Certain Point. i get why that is, the idea of rapists and unrepentent/unjustified/cold-blooded murderers On The Street where they’re ‘free to strike again’ is terrifying, on a close and personal level. but it’s amazing that i’m seeing people say they don’t trust cops, don’t trust prisons, don’t trust capitalist states to have our interests at heart, Except for when it scares us to go without those things. like if you’re for prison abolition at all, if you think in principle there’s nothing a human being could do to deserve their human rights being taken away by the government, then that needs to include the Scary Crimes done by Scary Bad People. because you’re falling for the illusion that the current system is protecting you from them already, and they’re not.

Do you have any posts that are solely about and go in-depth on ancient transgender history? I read somewhere on your blog that trans people are documented to exist in ancient sumerian tablets but I can’t find that post

patrexes:

makingqueerhistory:

Hi there! We have articles on Sappho, Khnumhotep & Niankhknum, and Zimri-Lim. The post you’re referring to comes from tumblr user @patrexes , this editor’s roommate Avia. I’ve referred to her for the entirety of this answer. She is not a part of this project, so if you like her content, consider supporting her ko-fi. So, from Avia herself:

the post you’re asking about is probably this one, of which i’m the op and afforded the translations. there’s also another post here but personally i’m a little….well, it’s pretty damn [cis voice] if you know what i mean. 

the original texts i excerpted and translated in that post are inanna c [transliteration | cuneiform fragment], inanna i [transliteration], inanna’s descent [transliteration | cuneiform], and the erra epos [transliteration and cuneiform].

inanna i is one of several extant texts which describe inanna’s own genderfluidity (and do so in the first person; it is inanna’s own self-description), and the descent describes the creation of the kurĝarru and gala-tur. erra is not about inanna but describes the kurĝarru again, alongside the assinu, and is nice to have, as an akkadian text rather than a sumerian one.

inanna c, in addition to the classic “to transform men into women and women into men is yours, inanna” quote also describes the creation or transformation of the pilipili, and has this… really cute quote, “dam dam tuku UR-bi LU níĝ dùg ki áĝ-ĝá dùg dinana za-kam”, translated typically as “to have a favorite wife to love is yours, inanna”.

the kurĝarru, gala-tur, assinu, and pilipili are all various terms for people which the CAD and ePSD obliquely describe as “cultic performers” and “religious functionaries” because they’re too prim and proper to say “sacred prostitutes”, a term i’m using as a fsswer myself both because “fsswer” just doesn’t have the same ring to it and the specification of full service is too important to just call them sex workers, and because “sacred prostitution” is the generally academically accepted term.

now, while the precise differences between the kurĝarru, gala-tur, assinu, and pilipili, also called ur-sal, sag-ur-sag, and some others are sometimes a little bit lost in translation (it’s unclear, for some, if these are separate categories or simply multiple words for the same people), and “transgender” is a modern word which will not necessarily perfectly encompass an understanding of gender that is some 6000 years old, it’s still quite reasonable to describe these people as overwhelmingly what today we would consider transgender and/or gender non-conforming, and there is evidence suggesting a wide range of personal identity, lifestyles, and forms of embodiment; as wide a range as we find in modern trans communities. 

what’s especially exciting to me, and hopefully to you as well, is that it’s not only that there’s documentation of trans people in sumer, it’s that we as trans and gnc people—as trans and gnc sex workers, even—aren’t even tolerated, but sacred. in this theology, we are created for inanna, in inanna’s own gnc image, as sacred things. in a world that thinks of us as expendable, dirty, subhuman… that’s so important. i really cannot overstate the serenity which comes of seeing yourself in your theology, and being explicitly told that you are valuable, that you are supposed to be this.

but anyway. if you want to do any further research yourself, there’s a surprising amount of scholarship on transness in sumer, and you’ll find german to be a particularly useful scholarly language. there are also some interesting comparative approaches, particularly with roman and hebrew contact. here’s an article on each. fair warning if you dig deeper, though, and aren’t super familiar with academia: the language used in scholarly work tends to be… impolite. transphobia and whorephobia abound here particularly, and they won’t shy from slurs.

hope this information proves helpful!

oh hey yall here’s some sumerian bullshit instead of scandinavian bullshit for once! enjoy

pure:

radical-my-dudes:

pure:

pure:

Lel I just learned a radical feminist group that got attention in the media for transphobia a while back was actually a front for a Christian fundamentalist organization.

This is well researched:

http://transadvocate.com/fake-radical-feminist-group-actually-paid-political-front-for-anti-lgbt-james-dobson-organization_n_20207.htm

Also I said a long time ago that Christians are beginning to use secular arguments to try to justify their attempts at establishing a theocracy…and people on both the left and the right are hand-feeding them this kind of approach.

Wow it’s almost as if actual radfems wouldn’t work with right-wing conservatives

I wish that was the case, but it isn’t…

Cathy Brennan, a radical feminist, collaborated with a Christian fundamentalist group called The Pacific Justice Institute to fabricate a story about a transgender teen who allegedly harassed other students. That claim was debunked by the directors of the school that the teen attended.

And now’s a good time to replug this piece. 

This is an except from an article entitled “Christian Right tips to fight transgender rights: separate the T from the LGB″ by the Southern Poverty Law Center, posted on October 23rd, 2017. I recommend reading the entire article. It details how some radical feminists have actively collaborated with Christian fundamentalists, how some Christian fundamentalists are using radical feminist arguements to push for the religious traditionalism they want the country to adhere to, and it expands upon some of the events referenced in the first article I mentioned in the original post. 

[Meg] Kilgannon [a member of a Christian fundamentalist group: Concerned Parents and Educators of Fairfax County] identified a wide coalition of potential allies outside the Christian Right who could confront trans friendly measures. Here’s her advice on how to draw them in: 

“Explain that gender identity rights only come at the expense of others: women, sexual assault survivors, female athletes forced to compete against men and boys, ethnic minorities who culturally value modesty, economically challenged children who face many barriers to educational success and don’t need another level of chaos in their lives, children with anxiety disorders and the list goes on and on and on.”

The list could almost read like a manifesto for intersectionality, if it weren’t for its exclusion of some key groups, most notably transgender people themselves.

For Kilgannon, an example of effective coalition building [among the Christian Right] includes the Hands Across the Aisle Coalition (HATAC), a group that unites religious and non-religious women to oppose transgender rights. The co-founders of the group are sexual assault survivor Kaeley Triller Haver and lesbian activist and radical feminist Miriam Ben-Shalom, who was discharged from the U.S. Army for declaring herself a lesbian in 1976. This started her decades-long battle against Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.

In 2016, Ben-Shalom was disinvited from being the grand marshal of the Milwaukee Pride parade because of her views on trans people and support for so-called “bathroom bills,” which would deny people access to public restrooms and other facilities that match their gender identities. Ben-Shalom claimed to Fox6Now in Milwaukee that “my fight is ensuring that women are safe from the pretenders who might use the trans issue to get in and hurt somebody,” a popular talking point on the anti-LGBT right as a justification for anti-trans bathroom bills.

The group, according to Kilgannon, is mobilizing seemingly progressive rhetoric to oppose transgender rights: in the group, she says:

“The feminists make eloquent arguments that gender identity really is the ultimate misogyny and the erasure of women. And lesbians in the group are concerned that trans and masculine girls is a form of lesbian eugenics.”

With little transparency on its website about who and what formed the group, HATAC might simply be a secular-facing iteration of the same anti-LGBT agenda that has driven the Christian Right for decades. Hands Across the Aisle sent a letter to Ben Carson, director of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, speaking out against the inclusion of trans women at single-sex women’s shelters. Revealingly, the letter’s co-signers (which include Meg Kilgannon) also include Michelle Cretella, the current president of the American College of Pediatricians, an anti-LGBT hate group that pumps out junk science on LGBT people, including attempts to link homosexuality to pedophilia or claims that LGBT people are a danger to children.

The attempt to depict the pushback against nondiscriminatory measures that include transgender people as a feminist struggle (an ironic fact for a movement that often derides feminism) was also embraced by other panelists. Cathy Ruse and Peter Sprigg, both senior fellows for the anti-LGBT hate group Family Research Council embraced this rhetoric. Cathy Ruse, who gave the opening speech of the panel, declared:

“Now what about girls? Did you know that feminists are at odds with the transgender movement? Last year a prominent feminist published a compendium of article under the title of Female Erasure. The subtitle is: what you need to know about gender politics’ war on women, the female sex, and human rights? What is the impact on girls who are bombarded with gender transition messages? In their young minds, do they hear that being female isn’t good enough?”

Peter Sprigg, who peddles myths linking homosexuality to pedophilia and has hinted that homosexuality should be criminalized, also wrapped his intervention in feminist rhetoric, commenting that:

“It’s particularly ironic that as our culture has developed where there is a greater range of choices, of activities, of careers that are available to men and women, boys and girls than there ever was before. And it’s really kind of ridiculous and almost retrograde to assume that we have to identify somebody’s gender identity on the basis of their activities or preferences.”

In many ways, there are possible allies to this pivot toward anti-trans secular movements: trans-exclusionary radical feminists, dubbed TERFs by some activists, have made waves in recent years. Some TERFs have reclaimed the term and redubbed themselves PERFs, penis-exclusionary radical feminists. Their rationale is that people who are assigned male at birth can never experience the same conditions as women do, and still hold on to their male privilege. (The latter becomes harder to prove in the face of the discrimination experienced by trans and gender non-conforming people.) As reported by Political Research Associates, trans-exclusionary feminists “may actually be guilty of drafting [the Christian Right’s] talking points, adding fuel to the fire of this dangerous anti-trans frenzy.”

And another damning thing said by Meg Kilgannon, excepted from the article Values Voter Summit Panelist: ‘Divide & Conquer’ To Defeat ‘Totalitarian’ Trans Inclusion Policies which was published on October 19th, 2017. It also references the events discussed in the previous article I linked. 

Kilgannon said secular arguments can reach a more diverse audience. Feminism is generally a dirty word among Religious Right activists; at the Values Voter Summit, Dana Loesch declared feminism “dead.” But Kilgannon said that the Hands Across the Aisle Coalition—which describes itself as a group of conservative and progressive women that rise above their differences “to oppose the transgender agenda”—includes feminists who argue that gender identity is the “ultimate misogyny” and “erasure of women.”  She said lesbians in the group are concerned that “transing masculine girls is a form of lesbian eugenics.” Citing shared opposition to gender identity, pornography and prostitution, she quipped, “I had no idea we agreed on so much.”