even worse, they seem to restate the point of every post they reblog. they added ‘Actually, did u know rape is bad’ to a post about rape being bad.

[a cropped blog description. “[I think] what I think and next-level shitposting. I also have a blanket rule against people with cluster B (BPD/NPD etc.) so I ask respectfully that you don’t interact with me. If you haven’t figured out I’m a radfem yet, you’re in for quite a treat.]

vodcar:

morphodyke:

so my housemate and i were talking last night about terfs because iโ€™ve been getting some more harassment, and she brought up how terfism is really a conspiracy theory, and a very unbelievable one at that.

i mean, itโ€™s literally absurd on the face of it. they believe that almost every trans woman (with the exception of those they groom in their communities) is part of a vast deception, one thatโ€™s been variously going on since Nazis, Stalin, or ancient greek necrophiles โ€œinventedโ€ trans women. that every single trans woman is actually on some level secretly a man, whether consciously or not. that every single trans woman is lying about the self-reporting of the abuse theyโ€™ve experienced. that everyone who is allies with trans women, has a trans woman family member theyโ€™re supportive of, is dating a trans woman, etc, is actually delusional and being decieved by this giant secret army of a bunch of men spontaneously giving up their entire lives to enact a conspiracy just to be able to appropriate from women (something that men are already freely capable of doing). it means believing that every single lgbt+ kid and ally who actually, like, understands the way gender is socially constructed is actually being misled into collectively believing a mass delusion. and it means believing that somehow all of this was caused and propagated by a group that ostensibly has almost no social power at all, and that it is being perpetrated against the majority of people on earth. all of these beliefs fly in the face of sense, demanding a suspension of disbelief that would be absurd were it not for the prevailing transmisogyny in our culture. and day-to-day, itโ€™s blatant and obvious that we are suffering, so that too must either be a hoax or a trick we are also playing on ourselves.

thereโ€™s just nothing plausible about terfism; the only reason its wild claims are listened to is because thereโ€™s such a widespread animosity against trans women that people will accept just about anything (again, there are hundreds of thousands of people on youtube that think weโ€™re reincarnated babylonian demons or whatever). it makes terfs feel special, like they really get the world in a way other cis women donโ€™t, that they, unlike other cis women, understand the Real Danger, and they can build a community out of reassuring each other constantly about the crazy distorted TroonWorld they live in. like any other conspiracy theory, it draws in people who feel alienated and disempowered, and gives them a quick access to a kind of feeling of social power built by their constant volley of hatred upon the lives of young girls. the adrenaline kick out of reblogging to prove someone wrong by tacking on an unrelated gotcha, probably knowing on some level the traumatic effect their constant harassment has and getting a sadomisogynistic kick out of that too. screaming again and again, โ€œyour words are irrelevant because all i can think about is your genitals.โ€ because clearly this is all about projection and transference: the chance to enact the most violent misogynist disparagement on an emotionally safe target, a target the terf can convince herself deserves every bit of harassment and hate.

is it really even about us? is this โ€œtrans conspiracyโ€ actually about us, or are we just the convenient targets for a series of women working theough the way their understanding of patriarchy attached to body forms rather than gender; people who felt traumatized and isolated and wanted to be part of a special community where they could feel like they have special insight; narcissists who donโ€™t realize they never actually respond to what trans women say but just react to key words like an algorithm? people who could work themselves up into believing there is a worldwide conspiracy of hundreds of thousands if not millions of people spontaneously giving up their previous life in order to secretly infiltrate womanhood, and that everyone else who knows them and sees the experiences of their lives is just being decieved or deluded? in other words, is the situation of terfism the sort of thing we can only understand when we entirely imagine it without the actual trans women who are being targeted, as a psychotic stage play acting out traumatic patterns inside a terfโ€™s mind? after all, where do troons and trannies and transactivists and all these images of terror come from? from inside the minds of terfsโ€ฆ

so perhaps we give them too much credit when we frame terfism as a response to our existence. we have existed as long as gender has; terfism is new. maybe itโ€™s a psychological response against the womenโ€™s liberation movement that ripped the curtain from in front of patriarchyโ€™s machinations of social construction. maybe j ray and mary daly and the others just couldnโ€™t deal with facing the void that is patriarchal reality, so they affixed to a simultaneous hatred of trans women and patronizing contempt for cis women who support trans women, to set themselves apart as the ones who, in gazing a little south of their navels all the time, could somehow find the true feminine mystical power / political analysis, unlike all these others and their complex problems. likewise, the rising โ€œsjwโ€ discussion of misogyny and gender on the internet has produced a slew of young women who canโ€™t accept fully deconstructing the patriarchal worldview, and fall even harder into weird bioessentialist stances than oldschool terfs. again, trans women here are not what is being reacted to. trans women are a target onto which terfs fixate, but what they respond to is patriarchy, and they channel itโ€™s energies against us. we are just the victims of their trauma narratives.

all of which is to say, maybe part of the reason itโ€™s so impossible to get through to a terf even when youโ€™re obviously right is because none of us have anything to do with this, except being the target of the violence. terfism is about the psychology of terfs, and how they react to learning about the structures of patriarchy. we are just objects for them to use in their narratives amongst each other. i doubt they really do care if they succeed in bringing a full-scale genocidal purge against us, because weโ€™re not real to them, and our lives could never matter to them in even the most basic human way (which is part of why they consistently treat actual men better than us). they are just using us, and until the culture of misogyny changes thereโ€™s little we can do, especially when they seem incapable of reading and actually understanding a single sentence that we write.

โ€œis it really even about us? is this โ€œtrans conspiracyโ€ actually about us, or are we just the convenient targets for a series of women working theough the way their understanding of patriarchy attached to body forms rather than gender; people who felt traumatized and isolated and wanted to be part of a special community where they could feel like they have special insight; narcissists who donโ€™t realize they never actually respond to what trans women say but just react to key words like an algorithm?โ€

macbcths:

macbcths:

hot new tumblr take

[ three paragraphs of blatant radfem politics with a completely meaningless โ€˜terfs donโ€™t touchโ€™ tacked on at the end as if that lessens the harm ]

*bonus points for โ€œop was a terf so i stole the postโ€ as if the post in question isnโ€™t still dripping w radfem bullshit bc itโ€™s from a terf

itโ€™s eight am so this is going to be slightly incoherent but: the โ€˜anti terfโ€™ crusade in internet activism circles, while well intentioned, essentially failed when it became a mindless recitation of โ€œfuck terfs,โ€ without any real widespread effort to educate about what radfem politics are and why theyโ€™re harmful

which is why you see people, especially lgbt+ kids who havenโ€™t had anything but the barest exposure to radfems, ( which is a good thing! iโ€™m definitely not saying it isnโ€™t. i was a 15 year old gay girl who was manipulated by older radfems, and thatโ€™s not a thing i want to ever happen again. ) who do mean well, who do want to cause positive change, somehow entrenched in politics that basically boil down to terf 101: introduction to shitty politics while making yourself look progressive

feminismandmedia:

Casual reminder that being or a minority group doesnโ€™t stop you from having bigotry against another or even against the one youโ€™re in. ๐Ÿ™ƒ

one guy told me he couldn’t be transphobic bc he was gay and had a grandfather who survived the holocaust. he was a huge transphobe and it turned out he gave the same speech to everyone he was harassing. it really seemed like he thought he knew everything about oppression so there was nothing more to learn

alyesque:

In response to Mike Cernovich telling someone to fuck off after that someone misgendered Chelsea Manning, someone responded this to Mikeโ€™s tweet. There are several other comments getting at basically this same point.

Why do I post this? Because this tells us something about why men behave the way they do towards trans women. For men, there is a fear of contamination. A sort of: If I am nice to trans women does it mean I am one?

And of course, who would want to be one of us? Who would want to be such a reviled thing. And so, cruelty towards the thing reviled is a means of distancing oneself from that thing.

Trans women present men with the fact that they *could* be something else. And that to become that something else they would lose their social status. Our existence denaturalizes patriarchal domination. It tells them โ€œyour power can be taken awayโ€

And so, when men see a trans woman like Chelsea hurting, they spit on her and take the time to attack her, to call for her suicide. Because they can distance themselves from the possibility of ever being the one spit on and abused.

And men will always suggest that those who donโ€™t treat us like shit, even if only for a brief moment (like Mike here), must actually be one of us. They have to maintain the distancing act and police each other. Its pathetic and sad.ย 

oak23:

oak23:

and wow itโ€™s surprising how fucking quickly people forget how fucking often gay cis men and trans women were conflated for one another that a character like Him from PPG can be a huge damaging stereotype that affects both marginalised groups

So when someone points to media that predates the 2010s of a problematic character and calls the presentation transphobic, your instinct should NOT to goย โ€œWell actually sweaty,,,, the character is obviously just a cis man using gay stereotypes not transphobia so itโ€™s homophobic not transphobicโ€.

Because while theyโ€™re not the same, homophobia and transphobia has ALWAYS fucking occupied the same space in mainstream media for deviating outside of expected gender norms ESPECIALLY when the shitty characters have been made by privileged people who never had to experience that kind of violence in their god damn lives.

You can never separate homophobia and transphobia enough to say one canโ€™t implicate the other especially when it comes from straight cis people. THIS is why it is so fucking important to remember that sexual and gender identity needs solidarity in this shitty fucking world when the people beating us down donโ€™t fucking care about the specifics.

lines-and-edges:

computationalcalculator:

androgyne-enjolras:

And like just so it gets said: *part* of the damage of reblogging innocuous posts that were written by TERFs (or REGs) are because often, they arenโ€™t actually innocuous. You just missed the tip-off. The secret buzzword.

Just because you didnโ€™t recognize the violent language doesnโ€™t mean the target didnโ€™t.

So what happens is, you reblog a post that looks like a chill positivity post โ€“ and a trans person, or a bi person, or an NB person, or an ace or aro person, now has violent targeted language on their dash that you mistook for being just pro-woman or pro-gay. Language THEY recognize and are wounded by. Language that reminds them that people who hate them are all around them.

So itโ€™s not even purely an issue of โ€œno platformingโ€ shitheads โ€“ checking the OP and not reblogging TERFs is also a security measure against sharing violent language that you donโ€™t recognize yourself.

this is a big part of why โ€œstealing this post bc OP was a terfโ€ is just comical levels of Missing The Fucking Point

Good posts to steal from TERFs: software tips, cute animal appreciation, screencaps and transcriptions of general-interest offsite content (although if itโ€™s a Twitter thread or something go over it with a fine-toothed comb, and if itโ€™s a news article check that itโ€™s not from a dodgy source.)

Bad posts to steal from TERFs: anything to do with intracommunity discourse or gender and sexuality. Honestly, why risk it? Even if the thesis is a super obvious idea like โ€œpatriarchy existsโ€ theyโ€™ll have found some way to plant some fucking creepy coded message in it.

sweetbabyraysgourmetsauces:

โ€œWomenโ€ is an inclusive enough umbrella term when talking about womenโ€™s issues. Saying โ€œwomen and people who identify as womenโ€ is just unnecessary word jumble and youโ€™re basically just saying โ€œwomen and people that think they are womenโ€ and you should stop. The term โ€œwomanโ€ is completely inclusive of trans women.