neilcicierega:

HERE’S MY PLAN TO PROMOTE CONDOM USE:

1. Create a cartoon, aimed at young children, where all the characters are adorable talking condoms. The cartoon is otherwise completely innocent and non-sexual, focusing on positive messages of friendship and caring.

2.

3. Now a bunch of grown men wanna fuck condoms

mauvists:

[image is an excerpt from a novel which reads, β€œI went downstairs to Dad’s encyclopedia and looked up HOMOSEXUALITY, but that didn’t tell me much about any of the things I felt. What struck me most, though, was that, in that whole long article, the world β€œlove” wasn’t used even once. That made me mad; it was as if whoever wrote the article didn’t know that gay people actually love each other. The encyclopedia writers ought to talk to me, I thought as I went back to bed; I would tell them something about love.” end ID]

from annie on my mind by nancy garden

froody:

just some good Star Trek episodes

  • Fuck You Dad You Cannot Have my Hemoglobin
  • My Wife The Sexy Energy Mass
  • Kirk Really Hates Small Furry Things
  • What if We Were Cowboys?
  • Scotty Gets An Alien Wasted
  • Scotty Gets Possessed By Jack The Ripper
  • What If We Were Mean?

pom-seedss:

genderqueerpositivity:

exyclusionist:

mogais keep inventing bullshit homophobic and/or just plain fucking useless terms like β€œqueerphobia” and β€œhomonormativity” when the only similar term i can think of that might actually be useful would be some fuckshit like β€œqueernormativity” since yall love to call every lgbt person β€œqueer” without our consent

Ordinarily, I wouldn’t bother reblogging a post like this, especially not to this blog. But this post is a perfect example of a major problem that exists on Tumblr. In short, history is being ignored, erased, and rewritten with every new discourse flavor of the week.

The term homonormativity has existed since the 90s. It’s creation is credited to the trans community. In specific, the term is credited to Susan Stryker: a transgender woman and professor of Women’s, Gender, and LGBT Studies.

This is a screengrab from The Sage Encyclopedia of LGBTQ Studies. But a simple search will show that Stryker has written much on homonormativity and trans history.

The history of the usage of queerphobia has been less easy to track down, but a few pages suggest that its been in use since the 90s as well.

Given the push for the reclaimation of queer during the 90s and the growth of queer theory around the same time, that would be entirely logical. In addition, searches on Google books for β€œqueer-phobic” and β€œqueerphobia” turn up related hits dating back to the late 90s.

But I’m short on time right now. I do intend to keep looking for additional sources on this. And if anyone has any I would be grateful to you for sending them my way.

However, my point is this: even if the term queerphobia had originated on Tumblr, and it did not, it has since spread beyond into wider community and academic usage. Queerphobia has been mentioned in everything from blog posts to academic journals since the mid 2000s at least.

If the existence of the term queerphobia did not benefit or add to discussions of queer oppression, would we use it? Obviously the term has a place and a usage.

I find it interesting and telling that an exclusionist would go out of their way to lie about the origins of terms like homonormativity, so much so as to deny credit to the trans woman who coined it.

And I believe I know why: Homonormativity is a term that helps us to discuss assimilation and respectability politics within the LGBTQ+ communities. Exclusionary discourse on this website has been pro-assimilation since day one.

In any case, the tl:dr is this:

1) Be very careful what you accept as true, because lies intended to push a specific narrative are posted on this website everyday.

2) Learn queer history. When we know our pasts, it will be that much more difficult for people with less than honorable intentions to manipulate us.

3) Just because you’ve never heard something before doesn’t mean it is a new word or concept. *especially* if it sounds like academic or activist jargon it has likely been in use for awhile and you should look it up before brushing it off. (I mean, and the wider: don’t brush things off just because they are new to you thing…)

i’ve yet to see a “mental illness culture on this site is so toxic/problematic” post that wasn’t condescending, disdainful, infantilising, completely misunderstands why mental illness tumblr exists in the first place, or is straight up “why don’t u just choose to get better already?”, or All Of The Above.

i mean theres “i realised i needed to stop posting depression memes all the time bc it was putting me in a bad space” which I understand and have no disagreement with, but then there’s those same voices being coopted by this vein of “if you were more positive you’d feel better”, which is an All Of The Above.

pro tip: accuse someone of ‘wallowing’ and that’s an All Of The Above Hole-In-One, congrats, don’t talk to mentally ill people ever again until u sort out your own issues