nose:

the-pesci-mode:

nose:

malcolm in the middle sequel where everyone is older except for dewey who is the same exact age

Series finale reveals Dewey as the centuries-old family patriarch when Hal’s latest hobby (capoeira) shatters the hourglass containing his tormented soul. Dewey knows he’s not yet made his penance to the world but calmly accepts he can never change what happened in 1346 and that maybe he deserves the peace of death after all. The final shot of the show sees Dewey, surrounded by his loving family, as ages rapidly into a cadaver, a skeleton, dust, and finally a single humble flower, as the screen fades to black and we hear a final echo of “life is unfair”

bruh

sangled:

moneysltd:

moldyfingers:

termytheantisocialbutterfly:

libertarirynn:

Are you telling me that the Teletubbies have, canonically, fucked? Because I am very uncomfortable with that information.

Um wat

turns out they’re called the tiddlytubbies and they have names

most likely umby pumby is la la’s kid and duggle dee is po’s. Yellow and red make orange, so Po and La La got together to have Ruru. 

Nin is purple, so that one is Tinky Winky’s. Dipsy’s is Daa daa because they’re both green. but look at daa daa’s antenna. seems a bit similar to la la’s no? la la and dipsy had some shit on the side.  

po, that other cheating fuck, had ping with tinky winky because ping is pink and that’s suspiciously similar to red and purple. also check out that fucking antenna. same as tinky winky’s. can’t hide the facts. po and la la were cheating on each other and now they have a shit ton of kids to pretend aren’t theirs. 

tinky winky and dipsy also aren’t innocent in this. the actual color of mi mi is an aqua green. green and blue. dipsy and tinky winky had mi mi AND they probably had Baa too. they had TWO KIDS and they’re off getting some tubby custard on the side. 

scandals galore in that damn superdome. 

A diagram for everyone who does not understand either. I found that the only pairs who had not had children together according to the above were Po and Dipsy, and Tinkywanky and Lala. Coincidentally Po, Lala and Tinkywanky all have children with only one confirmed parent. Considering the amount of cheating going on here, its quite likely that these children were the product of these pairs which have supposedly not boned. The suspected parents of these children have been indicated with dotted lines. An orgy happened here.

you: the teletubbies are having illegitimate children and cheating on each other

me, an intellectual: they’re polyamourous. they’re the polytubbies

A radical thought: could constitutional monarchies be important aids to democracy?

class-struggle-anarchism:

Since there is a royal wedding coming up, you’re probably going to see takes like this a lot, as people who’s self image demands that they appear to have put some intelligent thought into their political beliefs try to justify getting all excited about it.

So, whenever you see this historically illiterate ‘constitutional monarchy is a fail-safe mechanism against authoritarianism/fascism’ take, remember two things.

1. Original fascist Benito Mussolini co-existed with King Victor Emmanuel III of Italy just fine.

2. Hitler’s choice for head of a conquered British state was his good mate Edward VIII.

These days, the function of monarchy is to lend legitimacy to whatever political system is dominant at the time, and whenever that dominance shifts, for example from liberal democracy to fascist state, the function of the monarchy is to smooth that transition by providing continuity and conferring legitimacy. Given that the monarch has the power to dissolve parliament and is commander in chief of the British armed forces, the existence of the British monarchy is the one route by which a fascist takeover could be 100% legal and constitutional. 

Also worth remembering that the current heir to the British throne, Prince Charles, is a capital T traditionalist, a follower of Rene Guenon who thinks that we’re living at the end of a historical cycle and should be preparing for the next one, where we can transcend the “chronic imbalance and disharmony” of modernity.

A radical thought: could constitutional monarchies be important aids to democracy?