Author: peasantchick

bisappho:

friendly reminder that when a bisexual person vents to you about feeling like they’re faking and actually straight “then stop calling yourself bisexual”, “trust your feelings”, etc. are not the answers they need to hear 

argumate:

sleepymccoy:

Au where Scotty is Australian

“Nah, Cap, no chance of getting these engines going in the next hour. We’re up shit creek without a paddle for a while.”

“Turn the bloody heating down, Spock, it’s dry as a dead dingo’s donger in here!”

“I’ll see you tomorrow, Doc, it’s been a day of hard yakka and I’m drinking with the flies tonight.”

“Beam me out, would ya? I’m in the middle of bloody woop woop and I feel like a shag on a rock.”

Scotto

why does scotto want to engage in sexual intercourse on top of a rock

dandymeowth:

http://cardozzza.tumblr.com/post/162364426138/caseydickdanger-kindergraph-kindergraph-hey

this post is hilarious considering cardozzza was one of the diehard defenders of discourseprincessa, who was a cis woman pretending to be an intersex trans woman to get away with attacking people

this shitwipe was constantly telling inclusionist trans women to die and making other violent remarks lol which many trans women were calling out lol

and on top of that also claimed to be a “messianic” jewish person which many jewish people have said time and time again is not a thing and is antisemitic as fuck

and don’t come at me with that “but we were manipulated! stop hanging this over our heads!” because even if she wasn’t lying about who she was she was still claiming to be a “messianic” jewish person and threatening trans women!!

and that shit’s not suddenly unacceptable only because she turned out to be fucking cis, it was unacceptable to fucking start with!

I’m not gonna sit here and pretend this doesn’t have anything to do with the discourse and is “actually about helping people” because aphobes, cardozza included, have shown time and time again they don’t care about or will even defend when their own pull these kinds of stunts

Here’s some facts about this callout

1. aerf was not coined by them, in fact it was supposedly coined by trans women, and here’s a tweet from June 9th using it before this person did

2. this isn’t “bragging” about blocking trans women; they just remarked that they can block whoever they want after making a post about how nobody’s entitled to their creations 

and 3. it is absolutely correct that many trans women have expressed about how aphobes borrow TERF tactics and that it makes them feel afraid and unsafe, especially considering how often aphobes agree with TERFs and think that’s fucking fine

let alone the amount of cis people using “cishet” and saying shit like “saying cis people don’t have a say in transphobia is homophobic”, let alone the amount of people who are super willing to misgender nonbinary people and call us “basically (wo)men” to prove that sga is the main and most important aspect of being LGBT+, let alone their fucking constant intersexism

(this reblog explains it more eloquently)

and there’s a damned lot of people on this post that are completely ignoring all the ableist and misogynistic slurs which btw is an incredibly fucking common thing aphobes have been doing lol 

so again this all smells very strongly of being exactly about ace discourse

honestly, y’all need to stop listening to only the trans women and trans people that you personally like lol

a good reply:

tatterdemalionamberite said: I’m so fucking exhausted and enraged that this is going to be (is already being) used as a bludgeon against the trans women whose perspective Nora was boosting in the first place. Oh, and OP isn’t a trans woman either as far as I can tell, they just decided they’re an arbiter of what counts as transmisogyny, now that they can use that against a group of people including trans women that they don’t agree with. 

all this said i do think i’m going to block anyone using AERF because it’s painfully incorrect: exclusionists aren’t even tangentially related to any brand of feminism, they’re not radical, and the E in TERF and SWERF was meant to stand for exterminationist instead of exclusionist. AERF has also turned actual trans women calling out transphobic exclusionists into a joke

patrexes:

thequeerwithoutfear:

patrexes:

patrexes:

this is easily the most self-indulgent thing i’ve ever done. anyway happy pride, canon’s not real, here’s the girls decked out in some classic 90s queer direct action group looks. image description below the cut.

[ID: fanart of america chavez, kate bishop, and loki–the queer girls of the young avengers. the three pose beneath a lesbian avengers banner, because i think i’m funny.

america stands with a baseball bat slung over her shoulder. her jacket is half-on and falls behind her, and she has several pins – “DYKE”, “ask not what a lesbian can do for you but what you can do for a lesbian”, “dip me in honey and throw me to the lesbians”, “i’m doing my part to piss off the radical right” – and a black triangle patch on the jacket’s breast. she wears a loose-fitting crop top printed with the lesbian avengers’ iconic bomb graphic.

kate stands slouched forward, looking up through her lashes as she mimes eating someone out. she wears a labrys pendant, a tight-fitting purple crop top reading “civil rights or civil war”, and grey cargo pants with a chunky black and purple belt. her nail polish, lipstick, and hairband are also, you guessed it, varying shades of purple.

loki (with messy shoulder-length hair, broken helm, and missing tooth as per late agent of asgard era) stands with one fist raised. she wears a black t-shirt with “the transexual menace” – the spelling used by the eponymous direct action group, not a typo – printed on the front, tucked into a high-waisted green loosely-pleated miniskirt, and, of course, black fingerless gloves and black lipstick.

end ID.]

good morning look at my daughters i love them

hey i want this on a sticker

i’m a good friend and you asked so here’s the full thing as a print or laptop skin [link: x], and here’s america [link: x], kate [link: x], and loki [link: x], all on stickers & phone skins and also spiral notebooks bc america looked rlly cool on it so why not

Source: patrex.es

brainstatic:

I’m so fucking sick of this fixation on obsolete manufacturing jobs that only get attention because they’re seen as blue collar white man jobs. We’ve lost 90,000 retail jobs since Trump was elected, which is more than the entire coal industry employs. But we’ll never hear a peep about those because that’s work for women and POC.

And fuck all this demagoguing about foreigners stealing your job. A robot stole your job and it’s never coming back. 50 years ago a steel mill producing 500,000 tons of steel wire per year would employ 1,000 people, enough to prop up the economy of a small town. A steel mill with that same output just opened up and it employs, wait for it, 14 people. You won’t even see any humans on the production floor, just watching the monitors in the office above. No pussygrabbing orange fascist is gonna turn back the clock on that one. Oh sure, there was a candidate with a plan to retrain everyone in green technology jobs, but solar panels seem vaguely effeminate, not like the muscular labor of dragging shitty rocks out of the ground for pumping poison into the air. How about we really get back to basics and let dentists stick leeches on you again, there’s a lost source of income they could use. Maybe get some blacksmiths back to work. We’ll have a purely nostalgia-based economy and all the old demographics that we’re comfortable with.

fattyatomicmutant:

christawolf:

adrianianam:

What’s with this rhetoric that “it’s always just been LGBT” that’s cropping up? 

I’ve seen “LGB” and “LG” with my own damn eyes, I remember the goddamn bi-discourse that still goddamn crops up, I remember reading old articles about whether or not the coalition should include them, you’re trying to convince me that I just hallucinated that shit? And they have the gall to claim I’M the one doing historical revisionism here?

More to the point, how the hell do you think a full coalition can just spring up out of the ground fully formed like that before the concept of Bisexuality as a distinct identity was even codified? Anyone who claims otherwise are either misled or actively lying about the issue to preserve the illusion that LGBT is this immutable concept that emerged from the collective subconscious fully formed and it disregards all the hard work it took people to build the coalition into what it is currently. It’s not only historically inaccurate, that’s just plain not how shit works.

Like that’s right up there with “they don’t belong because they aren’t inherently LGBT” as if it isn’t an artificial coalition. Weak-ass arguments intended to sidestep the ACTUAL matter at hand.

Wasn’t it earlier this year they were talking about dropping the T? Again?!

They wanna Drop the T because they think Republicans are using our Identity Politics as ammunition against the Oberfell thing or something.

They stand on the Shoulders of Marsha P. Johnson to get this far only for them to cut us off from the larger community when we ask for Help. We ‘Inconvenience’ them and they cut us off. And they white wash away the Footprints they made on our shoulders.

I keep seeing this ridiculous idea that LGBT as an acronym sprung up because of Stonewall, so that anyone who says the T wasn’t always there can be accused of erasing the trans women at the event. it’s 3 separate decades of history they’re compressing into a soundbite.

if you believe ace lesbians hold a privilege over non-ace lesbians then you need to put that opinion in your bio or something so no one interacts w you on the mistaken assumption that you’ve ever come down to reality for a split second in your life, thanks