@patrexes unsurprisingly the argument was that she distrusted nonbinary people as a group for not “understanding transmisogyny”. and then tried the whole Monopoly of Suffering thing where an imagined trans person never suffering for being trans is an insult to the fibre of her being. they read like a villain backstory tbh. “dysphoria is my ultimate curse and so i swear vengeance on other trans people! they shall kneel before my deeply pointless wrath”

ACTUAL GENUINE REASONS WHY FEMINISM IS TERRIBLE

the-things-i-deserve:

callmegoddess618:

wagecucks:

okkusenman:

wagecucks:

an-average-sized-person:

Damn I thought I was a feminist but 🤔 idk man this shit turned me

One of the most important lessons I have ever learned is “don’t confuse the faith with the allegedly faithful.” This was a lesson given in the webcomic Something Positive during an arc where one of the main characters goes to a Christian themed Haunted House and gets sermoned by a bunch of ignorant, self righteous Christians who said 9/11 was caused by God as punishment for the US’ gay population. The end reveals the character himself was a Christian, who is in tears praying for the protection of all the people who have been made to feel less by other Christians simply for being gay.

Feminism is a LOT like Christianity. It’s a good philosophy, a very important one whose tenants are aimed at the liberation of women from the shackles imposed on them by society. Feminism is all about telling girls “you have CHOICES in life, you are FREE. Your life is YOURS. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.” But like any religion, there are bad people out there who claim to be feminists, yet they give this ideology a bad name. OP’s post provides a comprehensive but incomplete list of said people.

It is ALWAYS important to remember that we need to separate the ideology from its practitioners, as we separate the faith from its faithful. We need to see the VALUE of ideologies and divorce it from its applications by their practitioners. Feminists like Gloria Steinem, Taylor Swift and Anita Sarkeesian are to Feminism what ISIS and Al-Qaeda are to Islam or the KKK and Westboro Baptist Church are to Christianity: bad apples attempting to spoil the whole bunch. And like a bad apple, they need to be REMOVED as quickly as possible from the bunch, lest they spoil our bushel.

This is a parody post, if you follow the links

Literally every link is the same damn video. So anyone reblogging this by taking OPs claims seriously is proving they’re very bad at clicking a link

Just. Read the list. It has “feminism killed jfk” and “north korea makes feminism official religion”

i know like 90% of people on tumblr don’t fact check but this is ridiculously bad

saw one of those “only trans women are allowed to combat terfs and terf rhetoric” posts and in the notes was a trans guy asking if it was okay for him to fight terfs. like hey quick question what the fuck is the reasoning behind telling people to not fight for us. activism is labour and demanding that trans women and only trans women take an active stance is so wild? that’s why we have allies? to take some of this burden off our backs?

powermac:

clitcheese:

benepla:

ok y’all it’s time to stop using the word “neurotypical” to mean “someone who told me to do yoga when i said i was sad”. that was not it’s original context (it was, in fact, coined by autistic people and yoinked by mentally ill allistics lmao), and the idea that “non-mentally ill people” is a coherent class of people is BONKERS. ANYONE can be susceptible to mental illness, you do NOT know everyone’s history with mental illness, and even though people who are vocally against mental healthcare are obviously shitheads and dangers to themselves/their loved ones, to claim that their views are because they have a squeaky clean bill of sanity is just fuckin……wild.

anyway op isn’t autistic, and while neurotypical did originally mean not autistic, the definition has since expanded to include anyone without a mental illness or disability, basically because there are more mental and developmental disorders than just autism. this change happened about a decade ago more or less. the current word for non-autistic is allistic. neurotypical really does mean someone without a history of mental illness or disability. whether or not that’s a “coherent class”, whatever that means?

and if this is implying ableism somehow doesn’t affect mentally ill people then. idk that’s pretty fucking wild

a) as an autistic person, what they said has nothing to do with whether they’re autistic or not. they didn’t claim to be autistic or to speak for us. you’re just trying to start shit by bringing that up.

b) calling strangers “neurotypical” is a bad practice because you cannot KNOW their history with mental illness. they may be undiagnosed or not have the resources to recognize something or they might just not public with that information.

c) listen, mentally ill people ARE oppressed, but that doesn’t mean it’s easy to categorize every mentally ill person into a simple recognizable group. i STRONGLY doubt that op was trying to say that mentally ill people aren’t oppressed when they said that “neurotypical” and not neurotypical aren’t that easy to define, especially since some mentally ill people will never know what they’re dealing with or why. it’s not that black and white, and if neurotypical includes not having mental illness (in addition to developmental disorders), you can’t just apply it to anyone and everyone who you don’t agree with about mental health. in fact, you can’t really apply it to most people, because you don’t get to make that judgement.

yeah i don’t actually disagree w u. if u read what i said i was more concerned about terminology being misused. the ‘yoinked by mentally ill allistics bit’ is wrong and pretty demonising tbh. i’m aware that I can’t see someone’s mental health by looking at them, that’s not really what i was responding to